Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Fellechner <Lukas.Fellechner@gmx.net>
To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] lavf/dashdec: Multithreaded DASH initialization
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 23:29:06 +0200
Message-ID: <trinity-34ec8333-0fcb-49bb-8966-2a4c3d8a952a-1662326946407@3c-app-gmx-bs72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <GV1P250MB0737A8B67A8BE9EA9D89CDCB8F789@GV1P250MB0737.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Andreas Rheinhardt andreas.rheinhardt at outlook.com
Wed Aug 31 05:54:12 EEST 2022
>
> > +#if HAVE_THREADS
> > +
> > +struct work_pool_data
> > +{
> > +    AVFormatContext *ctx;
> > +    struct representation *pls;
> > +    struct representation *common_pls;
> > +    pthread_mutex_t *common_mutex;
> > +    pthread_cond_t *common_condition;
> > +    int is_common;
> > +    int is_started;
> > +    int result;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct thread_data
>
> This is against our naming conventions: CamelCase for struct tags and
> typedefs, lowercase names with underscore for variable names.

In the code files I looked at, CamelCase is only used for typedef structs.
All structs without typedef are lower case with underscores, so I aligned
with that, originally.

I will make this a typedef struct and use CamelCase for next patch.

> > +static int init_streams_multithreaded(AVFormatContext *s, int nstreams, int threads)
> > +{
> > +    DASHContext *c = s->priv_data;
> > +    int ret = 0;
> > +    int stream_index = 0;
> > +    int i;
>
> We allow "for (int i = 0;"

Oh, I did not know that, and I did not see it being used here anywhere.
Will use in next patch, it's my preferred style, actually.

> > +
> > +    // alloc data
> > +    struct work_pool_data *init_data = (struct work_pool_data*)av_mallocz(sizeof(struct work_pool_data) * nstreams);
> > +    if (!init_data)
> > +        return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
> > +
> > +    struct thread_data *thread_data = (struct thread_data*)av_mallocz(sizeof(struct thread_data) * threads);
> > +    if (!thread_data)
> > +        return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
>
> 1. init_data leaks here on error.
> 2. In fact, it seems to me that both init_data and thread_data are
> nowhere freed.

True, I must have lost the av_free call at some point.

> > +    // init work pool data
> > +    struct work_pool_data* current_data = init_data;
> > +
> > +    for (i = 0; i < c->n_videos; i++) {
> > +        create_work_pool_data(s, stream_index, c->videos[i],
> > +            c->is_init_section_common_video ? c->videos[0] : NULL,
> > +            current_data, &common_video_mutex, &common_video_cond);
> > +
> > +        stream_index++;
> > +        current_data++;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    for (i = 0; i < c->n_audios; i++) {
> > +        create_work_pool_data(s, stream_index, c->audios[i],
> > +            c->is_init_section_common_audio ? c->audios[0] : NULL,
> > +            current_data, &common_audio_mutex, &common_audio_cond);
> > +
> > +        stream_index++;
> > +        current_data++;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    for (i = 0; i < c->n_subtitles; i++) {
> > +        create_work_pool_data(s, stream_index, c->subtitles[i],
> > +            c->is_init_section_common_subtitle ? c->subtitles[0] : NULL,
> > +            current_data, &common_subtitle_mutex, &common_subtitle_cond);
> > +
> > +        stream_index++;
> > +        current_data++;
> > +    }
>
> This is very repetitive.

Will improve for next patch.

> 1. We actually have an API to process multiple tasks by different
> threads: Look at libavutil/slicethread.h. Why can't you reuse that?
> 2. In case initialization of one of the conditions/mutexes fails, you
> are nevertheless destroying them; you are even destroying completely
> uninitialized mutexes. This is undefined behaviour. Checking the result
> of it does not fix this.
>
> - Andreas

1. The slicethread implementation is pretty hard to understand.
I was not sure if it can be used for normal parallelization, because
it looked more like some kind of thread pool for continuous data
processing. But after taking a second look, I think I can use it here.
I will try and see if it works well.

2. I was not aware that this is undefined behavior. Will switch to
PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER and PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER macros,
which return a safely initialized mutex/cond.

I also noticed one cross-thread issue that I will solve in the next patch.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-04 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-20 21:35 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/1] " Lukas Fellechner
2022-08-20 21:53 ` Lukas Fellechner
2022-08-21  4:10   ` Steven Liu
2022-08-21 12:47     ` Lukas Fellechner
2022-08-21 19:26 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] " Lukas Fellechner
2022-08-23  3:19   ` Steven Liu
2022-08-23 19:09     ` Lukas Fellechner
2022-08-23 19:03 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] " Lukas Fellechner
2022-08-23 19:03   ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] lavf/dashdec: Prepare DASH decoder for multithreading Lukas Fellechner
2022-08-31  2:09     ` Steven Liu
2022-08-23 19:03   ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] lavf/dashdec: Multithreaded DASH initialization Lukas Fellechner
2022-08-31  2:54     ` Andreas Rheinhardt
2022-08-31  7:25       ` Steven Liu
2022-08-31 12:17         ` Andreas Rheinhardt
2022-09-04 21:29       ` Lukas Fellechner [this message]
2022-09-04 22:50         ` Andreas Rheinhardt
2022-09-05 10:15           ` Lukas Fellechner
2022-09-05 10:45             ` Andreas Rheinhardt
2022-09-05 14:28               ` Lukas Fellechner
2022-09-11 20:35               ` Lukas Fellechner
2022-08-23 19:03   ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] lavf/dashdec: Fix indentation after multithreading Lukas Fellechner
2022-09-05 21:16 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4 0/4] lavf/dashdec: Multithreaded DASH initialization Lukas Fellechner
2022-09-05 21:16   ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4 1/4] lavf/dashdec: Prepare DASH decoder for multithreading Lukas Fellechner
2022-09-05 21:16   ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4 2/4] lavf/dashdec: Multithreaded DASH initialization Lukas Fellechner
2022-09-05 21:16   ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4 3/4] lavf/dashdec: Prevent cross-thread avio_opts modification Lukas Fellechner
2022-09-05 21:16   ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] lavf/dashdec: Fix indentation after adding multithreading Lukas Fellechner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=trinity-34ec8333-0fcb-49bb-8966-2a4c3d8a952a-1662326946407@3c-app-gmx-bs72 \
    --to=lukas.fellechner@gmx.net \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git