From: "\"zhilizhao(赵志立)\"" <quinkblack@foxmail.com>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] fftools/ffmpeg_mux: fix reporting muxer EOF as error
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 17:48:24 +0800
Message-ID: <tencent_5B20CD38A03DCDEFCFE3D52AA76A38B59607@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae7843ac-e742-9b3c-f699-3eb7b6b2585a@passwd.hu>
> On Apr 23, 2023, at 17:42, Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2023, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>
>> Quoting Marton Balint (2023-04-23 11:12:38)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2023, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Quoting Zhao Zhili (2023-04-22 14:56:34)
>>>>> From: Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao@tencent.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix #10327.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao@tencent.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fftools/ffmpeg_mux.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fftools/ffmpeg_mux.c b/fftools/ffmpeg_mux.c
>>>>> index a2e8873ad2..0e1a5d7dc5 100644
>>>>> --- a/fftools/ffmpeg_mux.c
>>>>> +++ b/fftools/ffmpeg_mux.c
>>>>> @@ -214,9 +214,15 @@ static void *muxer_thread(void *arg)
>>>>> ost = of->streams[stream_idx];
>>>>> ret = sync_queue_process(mux, ost, ret < 0 ? NULL : pkt, &stream_eof);
>>>>> av_packet_unref(pkt);
>>>>> - if (ret == AVERROR_EOF && stream_eof)
>>>>> - tq_receive_finish(mux->tq, stream_idx);
>>>>> - else if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> + if (ret == AVERROR_EOF) {
>>>>> + if (stream_eof) {
>>>>> + tq_receive_finish(mux->tq, stream_idx);
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + av_log(mux, AV_LOG_VERBOSE, "Muxer %s\n", av_err2str(ret));
>>>>
>>>> That seems unnecesarily convoluted, given that we _know_ the error to be
>>>> EOF here. Also, please make it "Muxer returned EOF" to make it clear
>>>> what exactly is the source of EOF.
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise ok, feel free to push with this change.
>>>
>>> This seems like yet another clash of AVERROR_EOF error codes coming from
>>> different places with different semantics. For
>>> av_interleaved_write_frame(), AVERROR_EOF is an error condition, so
>>> file encoding should fail,
>>
>> Why should it fail? I'd think a muxer returning EOF is the way to signal
>> non-error muxer-side termination.
>
> That would be an API change. AVERROR_EOF is not special in any way from other error codes for av_interleaved_write_frame. A muxer cannot signal non-error muxer side termination with existing API.
Sorry I have pushed before seeing your comments.
It can happen in theory, but I’m not sure in which case muxer can return
EOF and should be treated as a real error condition.
A simple grep shows:
$ grep 'AVERROR_EOF' libavformat/*enc.c
libavformat/hlsenc.c: if (ret >= 0 || ret == AVERROR_EOF) <--- It changed ret to 0 afterwards.
libavformat/webmdashenc.c: return AVERROR_EOF; <—-- More like a bug on the caller side than a real error.
>
> Regards,
> Marton
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-23 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-22 12:56 Zhao Zhili
2023-04-22 15:44 ` Anton Khirnov
2023-04-23 9:12 ` Marton Balint
2023-04-23 9:34 ` Anton Khirnov
2023-04-23 9:42 ` Marton Balint
2023-04-23 9:48 ` "zhilizhao(赵志立)" [this message]
2023-04-23 9:51 ` Anton Khirnov
2023-04-23 10:05 ` Marton Balint
2023-04-23 10:07 ` Nicolas George
2023-04-23 12:01 ` Anton Khirnov
2023-04-23 18:15 ` Marton Balint
2023-04-23 20:16 ` Anton Khirnov
2023-04-24 9:09 ` Marton Balint
2023-04-24 9:19 ` Nicolas George
2023-04-24 10:02 ` Anton Khirnov
2023-04-24 18:41 ` Marton Balint
2023-04-24 19:24 ` Anton Khirnov
2023-04-24 19:42 ` Marton Balint
2023-04-24 21:08 ` Anton Khirnov
2023-04-25 14:37 ` Nicolas George
2023-04-24 20:41 ` Nicolas George
2023-04-24 10:08 ` Anton Khirnov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_5B20CD38A03DCDEFCFE3D52AA76A38B59607@qq.com \
--to=quinkblack@foxmail.com \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git