From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F5D482A7 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2955568CBDC; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:28:26 +0200 (EET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (unknown [66.111.4.28]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D71BD68C2B6 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:28:19 +0200 (EET) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75F45C084A for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:28:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:28:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=itanimul.li; h= cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1700497698; x=1700584098; bh=YP 1Y+KvaLHHEFNSNF721PJeKI99hRrqPFTW9PxoOOII=; b=eMLpxjgFArzdQ+m/Xb ysTG/nlJe0PU3LoHCwE2sO1w3yRErd09JE7ReG7pLReAgWJrSKncQnlvRBSgCvYS zPnS7FEhsgP61bItVsBeUi62C53gQKsLEZzRFHxiSjCa6qtu+G0hEo/JIkJDW1Q5 SW8pJEdDZkgSAVkdORAMhO2SSCcjPg7bGQwUlx5HlzbLJ1+xY4ba3qzjVh9AXDnu VllPEVMtH2saNQmXb6xtAFm2bPLamvnmWn4sdLOMgQ6S6bezI4nOeoUQo5VjjrdZ 8kknc3QcjpTichzhd0tPA4XDuigbtxkI+2eN/IUlh6sfIC0kKS3vy86JjNl1F8hx b+pQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1700497698; x=1700584098; bh=YP1Y+KvaLHHEF NSNF721PJeKI99hRrqPFTW9PxoOOII=; b=gYhTMwfG33EUK7sTbpxxW99xaXPkE u34LozA0AHdy+itKwJBtXhqEPZDvbGkKDUQidCvWWjKMYZ6ND/cHAHpaD6q2i7gL BWpRfhacHuR0/xoGaHR7yD5YUX6kFV8O4smagWJOuhVYAoMZY4vbKO9hXFKS550e X0xfGmdZwVWb/i9bBCjrLAwb8oanVA3OhcUz+tTWJyk+9HjIir3T5QadAuo9b32s lFBppjxfEkRmnCwXEyOO2GX6Z992fvPLBmEDBLVfotgi3Pd+hdjmFi+Ko2EvaxDF zvkj+j3m3yhceAdYriCn7l93FJr6ELab8O3W41YXLjYa9mmdodwG8n2vA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrudegjedgiedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpehffgfhvffuffgjkfggtgesthdtre dttdertdenucfhrhhomhepfdflrdcuffgvkhhkvghrfdcuoehjuggvkhesihhtrghnihhm uhhlrdhliheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeejudevffdvheegjeeivdetteefgeegtd ejtdehleffleeufeeufedvieffffehnecuffhomhgrihhnpehffhhmphgvghdrohhrghen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjuggvkh esihhtrghnihhmuhhlrdhlih X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i84994747:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:28:17 -0500 (EST) References: <2e3245e3-e71d-4f17-9c5b-ba2087d30049@mail.de> <95c03377-6984-4e40-90d6-693484134454@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 30.0.50 From: "J. Dekker" To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:08:43 +0100 In-reply-to: <95c03377-6984-4e40-90d6-693484134454@gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Repeat vote: GA voters list updates X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Derek Buitenhuis writes: > On 11/20/2023 3:44 PM, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote: >> the results are available at [1]. As they confirm the just updated GA list as >> well as the update procedure twice a year on Jan 1st & Jul 1st, I think the >> upcoming votes (extra GA members, TC/CC elections) can then proceed as announced. > > The vote was not valid and announcing them like this is misleading. > > - Derek Here's a link to the original vote results: https://vote.ffmpeg.org/cgi-bin/civs/results.pl?id=E_029f7195fed7aadf Yes, 'redoing' the vote is completely questionable; yes, even I objected to it personally. And whilst we don't know how reliable the 2nd vote was, the outcome is still the same as the original vote: this means that it is possible to both discard the 2nd vote and prefer it (depending on your perspective). Some previous mails quoted me on IRC but seemed to omit essential information, so I will repeat it here on the mailing list. The original voter list was made in a few minutes by myself and the exact copy was lost to time, I found different versions looking through my mails sent and it's pretty unreliable. Saving the git hash and a date was something added later. However, none of this is really relevant since all we really need is a general consensus to update the GA list using the script--from which we are able to have a traceable list of voters and stop worrying about this. In short: We should be able to move forward now. -- jd _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".