From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793B34A243 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F8068D37B; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:54:56 +0300 (EEST) Received: from glom.nmugroup.com (glom.nmugroup.com [193.183.80.6]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47A9D68C768 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:54:50 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glom.nmugroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA845429D30 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from debian.lan (unknown [IPv6:2a00:66c0:a::72c]) (Authenticated sender: git01) by glom.nmugroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A67F25429B55 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: From: Tomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdin?= To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:54:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <309dc932-eca9-42a6-a0b8-97827065647c@mediaarea.net> References: <309dc932-eca9-42a6-a0b8-97827065647c@mediaarea.net> User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/jpeg2000dec: support of 2 fields in 1 AVPacket X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: ons 2024-04-24 klockan 13:20 +0200 skrev Jerome Martinez: > Hi, I'm bumping this patch proposal for avoiding a situation where > FFmpeg skips half the visual content when 2 jpeg2000 codestreams are > present in one frame. I re-reviewed this discussion and think I > answered > all concerns. I'm hesitant with patch v3 because I consider that > touching frame_worker_thread for this feature is not so useful but I > am > ok with either patch v2 or v3. Did you look at doing this further up, say in demux.c? Because adding codec-specific logic for this seems wrong, when J2K is far from the only codec that can be used like this in MXF.. /Tomas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".