Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] lavu/bswap: remove some inline assembler

[James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>]

On 6/11/2024 10:15 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 09:19:46PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>> C code or compiler built-ins are preferable over inline assembler for
>> byte-swaps as it allows for better optimisations (e.g. instruction
>> scheduling) which would otherwise be impossible.
>>
>> As with f64c2e710fa1a7b59753224e717f57c48462076f for x86 and Arm,
>> this removes the inline assembler on GCC (and Clang) since we now
>> require recent enough compiler versions (this indeed seems to work on
>> AArch64).
>> ---
>>   libavutil/aarch64/bswap.h | 56 ---------------------------------------
>>   libavutil/avr32/bswap.h   | 44 ------------------------------
>>   libavutil/bswap.h         |  8 +-----
>>   libavutil/sh4/bswap.h     | 48 ---------------------------------
> 
> As you are writing that this preferrable for better optimisations
> Please provide benchmarks (for sh4, avr32)

This is a ridiculous request, considering nobody has such hardware at all.

> 
> thx
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".