From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2383842739 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4579D68B27B; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:08:26 +0300 (EEST) Received: from msg-1.mailo.com (unknown [213.182.54.11]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C74268AF1C for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:08:19 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mailo.com; s=mailo; t=1651255698; bh=sh8XnFOW8y8VuEOrD6UZVnRl74BMb1kZWXa3MFIthq0=; h=X-EA-Auth:From:To:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:X-Mailer:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Oj8ZjNOZyMcN5IJKLRVdSmPnXB+LSFQYcCGFH3xr1dwIEgPpQr8h9vpNmuHrhb7Wx IkGc/K6fR/9bJSZDZFibxOnzZpeu0qCEpPyGlrRcmvCTIRWjfHdM+dG9MKt94rAsMV 6eYiSiPgCD+VeAj+ShBJZ5Sk8dcIX0DN7VxW1h2s= Received: by www-7.mailo.com with http webmail; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:08:18 +0200 (CEST) X-EA-Auth: doq48BX9rOfLcm/bIAvaylaC8VbxqG/c6YktSKCyMlPK+ZjBbxT7NcBAwQji4u+vPb7T/hvKTDsdF8ksLrnn9FVhTEuwFSaK From: nil-admirari@mailo.com To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:08:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: COMS/EA21.01/r20220415 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v11 5/6] fftools: Enable long path support on Windows (fixes #8885) X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: > What is the effect of the version attribute here? Would it be meaningful > to replace the static dummy value with something more realistic like > "5.1.n" or similar? Version is a required attribute, see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/sbscs/application-manifests. It does not have any meaning, but some value has to be provided, and "1.0.0.0" is as good a value as any (version must be in major.minor.build.revision format: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/sbscs/assembly-versions). "5.1.n.m" must be either manually updated or regenerated with something like "ffmpeg/tools/gen-rc". Both approaches are more laborious than just "1.0.0.0". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".