Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] avfilter/setpts: add option to decide framerate handling
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 20:33:01 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <e82b6db1-dfdb-e2f8-453c-63afbcbd8630@passwd.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a0fd79d-3f6f-462f-95bd-9392277f1ad8@gyani.pro>



On Sun, 26 Jan 2025, Gyan Doshi wrote:

>
>
> On 2025-01-26 07:09 pm, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>  Hi,
>>
>>  On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:06 PM Gyan Doshi <ffmpeg@gyani.pro> wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>>  On 2025-01-26 12:49 am, Marton Balint wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  On Sat, 25 Jan 2025, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  In f121d95, the outlink framerate was unconditionally unset.
>>>>>  This breaks/bloats outputs from CFR muxers unless the user explicitly
>>>>>  sets a sane framerate. And the most common invocation for setpts seen
>>>>>  in
>>>>>  workflows, our docs and across the web is `PTS-STARTPTS` or others of
>>>>>  the
>>>>>  general form `PTS+constant` which preserves the input framerate.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Fixes #11428
>>>>>  ---
>>>>>  v4: negated option sense and renamed to vfr
>>>>>
>>>>>  doc/filters.texi          | 6 ++++++
>>>>>  libavfilter/setpts.c      | 6 +++++-
>>>>>  tests/fate/hevc.mak       | 2 +-
>>>>>  tests/fate/mov.mak        | 2 +-
>>>>>  tests/filtergraphs/setpts | 2 +-
>>>>>  5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>>  diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi
>>>>>  index b926b865ae..ea11d045ec 100644
>>>>>  --- a/doc/filters.texi
>>>>>  +++ b/doc/filters.texi
>>>>> @ @ -31478,6 +31478,12 @@ This filter accepts the following options:
>>>>> @ item expr
>>>>>  The expression which is evaluated for each frame to construct its
>>>>>  timestamp.
>>>>>
>>>>>  +@item vfr (@emph{video only})
>>>>>  +Boolean option which determines if the original framerate metadata
>>>>>  is unset.
>>>>>  +If set to true, be advised that a sane frame rate should be explicitly
>>>>>  +specified if output is sent to a constant frame rate muxer.
>>>>  I propose a more understandable variant for the first sentence:
>>>>
>>>>  Sets the filter output to variable frame rate by dropping the original
>>>>  constant framerate information if present. If set to true...
>>>  But that's not actually the case. This option does not make the output
>>>  VFR. If it did, this option would not be needed.
>>>  Once FR is unset, if the output goes to a CFR muxer and fps_mode is not
>>>  specified, ffmpeg will emit a  CFR stream using the time_base.
>>>  What the option does is a single narrow technical thing which has
>>>  implications depending on context. And that was the basis for the
>>>  original option name and description.
>>>
>>>  'strip_fps' and a corresponding description seems more accurate.
>>
>>  (I'm the bug reporter.) I actually agree. Setting FPS doesn't mean CFR, it
>>  could just mean average frame rate or something. But please decide on
>>  something, we're currently stripping said metadata and there's no way to
>>  reinstate it except with lengthy hacks that we don't want people to start
>>  posting on stackoverflow - because then we'll never hear the end of it.
>
> Ok, I'll change to strip_fps and push tomorrow (~18h) if there are no 
> objections.

Ok, "strip_fps" is fine by me.

Thanks,
Marton
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-26 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-25  8:00 Gyan Doshi
2025-01-25 19:19 ` Marton Balint
2025-01-26  4:06   ` Gyan Doshi
2025-01-26 13:39     ` Ronald S. Bultje
2025-01-26 14:05       ` Gyan Doshi
2025-01-26 19:33         ` Marton Balint [this message]
2025-01-27 12:12           ` Ronald S. Bultje
2025-01-27 12:22             ` Gyan Doshi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e82b6db1-dfdb-e2f8-453c-63afbcbd8630@passwd.hu \
    --to=cus@passwd.hu \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git