From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5130743B16 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC72568B95F; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:02:07 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail-oa1-f45.google.com (mail-oa1-f45.google.com [209.85.160.45]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4941568B4C4 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:02:01 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail-oa1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-f2a4c51c45so13732610fac.9 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:02:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Tl4yFz+IfvYTK4cBFVeZvdOjpICQHco+9t3AZ0MRMc=; b=SLvMlESqEZhhB6oqfH2vrvl0AeF7U+sB+rHIejMD1I+MzAQinotst4Hg/MNKcxr/we Z0Bgm1uumRBiTOOoGBiUpu5szzCnXRQsnQI3buObTMkO2lxdfQrdCqbmw+6ZLTsXXT+a 2zA1yY5SmA48C6uvZBXX5ryJtIy7P7ZYBZtqIxAu8bedqMn2/jee8n75+xsTj6gslT/R UU3WaVg8/69U7DVil/3GAERgwsSoxR9av9jre7n4DAkm/Eygi6DNFvMqDfY772DNtupA TQP87XVNCjBQdRij1xtVAc+N3CzCgkuf2b6Ste56bRIQNOZBC58FXj52lS0+ZA3d2ZFf REeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Tl4yFz+IfvYTK4cBFVeZvdOjpICQHco+9t3AZ0MRMc=; b=0hPMSUHXZr0jW4dXUmxYwA+17kucvx0jCwzewCBiSPTkv8GVb5Kxe4cU0xvaId/cwo vm1UFs45mIBs4rtqSFFRLSEvE7IhXXWdw+lSwhGoxsbpb15TB3W7GCaiqUPEfDx4Ax5e tijmiM9U/o/M3E/IA0f8gPZdkeW3u3yO9VLx/NABaaLEiZEDRlCVWlqb/+NJlh6B0g2F 5g6ylLmfZmCG9+3PAYwPQD6gaR6rsqwW4cZ/4vhWrkWoBuUkKsjrfHIod2U1wVim9ELe j0epFOGH1ikdTlIujHwwFtr5KiLuZGNYspnS1O5T6NqP7a3VVsI6AMBcx0S0EN9QPi1Y YWeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+qs7dRTt6cfpro/GFZRudegHwDRcKuuOp3tpExDk3ooYHLv+al 3ziju7mAj5ECHiwbE6yMeLhOijMlDl6xVQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vuTbOw3gXldggcfl1m7vtVAI2lUoxft4Rftuje4jyDjkowFEGSO7+nOsinnr9UHnxYd7hFKQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:f21c:b0:10a:305a:83e4 with SMTP id t28-20020a056870f21c00b0010a305a83e4mr4131386oao.286.1657713718975; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.13] ([186.136.131.204]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t10-20020a0568080b2a00b0033a11fcb23bsm2444077oij.27.2022.07.13.05.01.57 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:01:58 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Content-Language: en-US To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <1645351900.763634.1657643310996.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1645351900.763634.1657643310996@mail.yahoo.com> <1044727933.1088233.1657699406295@mail.yahoo.com> From: James Almer In-Reply-To: <1044727933.1088233.1657699406295@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Request: make framepool visible externally X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 7/13/2022 5:03 AM, Marco Vianini wrote: > Actually I was speaking about framepool, and not bufferpool. > framepool is intended to get an "AVFrame *" from a pool, by "ff_frame_pool_get". > At the moment it is available only internally to "libavfilter". > It permits an important improvement on performances, by using a pool. So it should be very nice if I could use it in my own code. > To be possible framepool.h should become a public header. > Thank You Please, do not top post in this list. I know you want AVFrames. What i mean is that you should use the existing buffer pool API to achieve that. Write your own function that returns a freshly allocated AVFrame that fills the buf[] and data[] fields with buffers returned by av_buffer_pool_get() instead of av_buffer_alloc(). _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".