From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27A743ADA for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 22:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D50068B941; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 01:51:46 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com (mail-wm1-f44.google.com [209.85.128.44]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8784268B8E5 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 01:51:40 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id az6-20020a05600c600600b003a530cebbe3so3362692wmb.0 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:51:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc; bh=KhgSxYlxE0CK+JjmE59FpiLqnw9XCbD8wzi5ihXNBUk=; b=RNWtAJOJ6GPxTlF/LlT2HmGVXU58d6iebX5VnYvYFYr8wLPqOLL1xlspQ8Vja34eIU OufaA9e0Jttx4O1cVnQorpbf0Cte7Zi/FCZbpfIPTRGTM/QbQ/TkK8Z4kSQVtxVgWtjh 0v36CRbkrs+lxeG+zeClYtRncycoO60AITLtGvZTQEwg6fJjD/SBJbEH4jYNzK70jobr FHCZckS2fTidZd+OP5k8ong+aeW0xLxqfa25+AmoLGBaVphZTNedADWgCbTj13hou7JW 4hgPGpGPCJpwl5G/C37hZD6lChge2V/fwfKKVe26q/8vwYk+tAfroI0juOWibKmVC8rF TcHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc; bh=KhgSxYlxE0CK+JjmE59FpiLqnw9XCbD8wzi5ihXNBUk=; b=pvV20reAxubwJL8MfIlmOTfYi6/319/c/xRU5xzdcttbl6ppBecHJz/+Y/JUfD9GKP 57UC22jaCo5AyqesmM7QN6QX2Ny8g99SL5wjRUDgFn9/NlkNihrNW5UDxbLO9c+23NVO ICmiTq/0ylanlW4xC8FB3eJ9AQwKB5JGUhyvRavUEheDfUj2rZofWVzYVTsjVrs8Giwh fUfBV39RlP2qiJpJ+oD3GsUvbX1s+ULt4JD7PU3MDD2EzHtksMjqW3lfFnNbqBgLjWjx Z/LM7P69wZEa7HU67PjcCpgtWvzMe3kljdQp0rGaRJKcm5ItUuoHiE4Tfr6yGvf7NHao j2jA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1cuLgiTJmqzZQ6SyJ/uJMaOQFpQSY9NhxZhp4rRZKGSbAp5ADa E733hcKy9DjqNbxvpEbDcz9id/fSv+c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7x1GIMZIAYqAtQyA63FSvVrj53MfnnXmIG1YNVCGi8E6tvObFWIntZc4Gv4nuaoILGfSzwGg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b1a:b0:3a5:51d8:afce with SMTP id m26-20020a05600c3b1a00b003a551d8afcemr6985487wms.129.1660258299665; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.106] ([149.12.10.163]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l19-20020a7bc453000000b003a54f49c1c8sm777039wmi.12.2022.08.11.15.51.38 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 23:51:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <20220810222708.186270-1-derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com> <612e12d2-4df2-a2fc-5560-7acd93c2fc8f@rothenpieler.org> <20220811201834.GE2088045@pb2> <7ce22e69-d0ad-16b7-52c6-0a447ce05be2@rothenpieler.org> From: Derek Buitenhuis In-Reply-To: <7ce22e69-d0ad-16b7-52c6-0a447ce05be2@rothenpieler.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ipfsgateway: Remove default gateway X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 8/11/2022 11:03 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > Any kind of built in hardcoded server is not acceptable imo. > Even with it pointing to our own infrastructure, we can't really > guarantee its availability, specially should the protocol gain traction > and heavy use. I agree... we should never send a users data through *any* service they haven't explicitly asked for. Ever. Regardless of who runs it and who is deemed "trustworthy". > The patch wasn't on my radar at all. I had assumed it was actually > implementing IPFS in some fashion. Yes, I had assumed the same too, and thus wasn't following the sets at all. As it exists right now though, I don't really see why lavf needs what amounts to a URL builder for a service as a "protocol" - this totally the wrong layer to do that at... - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".