From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C2548F82 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 12:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC9968CDAA; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:20:13 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org (mout-p-101.mailbox.org [80.241.56.151]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0A5C68C463 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:20:06 +0300 (EEST) Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V7VSz3dKCz9sqh for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 14:20:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 17:50:01 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <170841737762.27417.14992162535824834057@lain.khirnov.net> <171197020823.28449.16252646530072781610@lain.khirnov.net> Content-Language: en-US From: Gyan Doshi In-Reply-To: <171197020823.28449.16252646530072781610@lain.khirnov.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4V7VSz3dKCz9sqh Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] clarifying the TC conflict of interest rule X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 2024-04-01 04:46 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Hi all, > > the vote has now ended with 23 votes cast, results are available at > https://vote.ffmpeg.org/cgi-bin/civs/results.pl?id=E_a6be1eb156d0e589 > > The winning option is 'Anton', i.e. my proposal. Voting data as reported > by CIVS is attached to this email for future reference. How come there's an entry with all 7s? The choices were ranks, not weight markers. Regards, Gyan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".