On 24.12.2021 21:51, Kyle Swanson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Never followed through on this vf_libvmaf patch from last June, and
> I've had several people asking about its status lately. Rebased patch
> attached. It's been a while, so I guess let's start the review again.
> Would be nice if we could get this in before 5.0.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kyle
> 
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 6:55 AM Moritz Barsnick <barsnick@gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> -enabled libvmaf           && require_pkg_config libvmaf "libvmaf >= 1.5.2" libvmaf.h compute_vmaf
>>> +enabled libvmaf           && require_pkg_config libvmaf "libvmaf >= 2.0.0" libvmaf.h vmaf_init

The primary question remains.
Is dropping <2.0 support okay, when there's distros out there not having 
2.0 yet?