From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B4D426D1 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF25768B093; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:45:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DF2168AEFA for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:45:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA435C023E for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 15:45:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap49 ([10.202.2.99]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 15:45:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1650915919; x= 1651002319; bh=SBGNMho3OfduajM3EILC5FrTswhy2gEmGiant5SjFEM=; b=I GMM8/Ct7zuctJsh4GnDQlsOBZrHrmmrSQ2JguOCu3XTi6xswtjiFrsV7tFKWAIIR /9VUD1zpHCLvaRLEeKZttVilQD0MtlTC1KpnlFEDjZXZyja60WUrI00UGOjMccpJ JMW6Wrz8CtrGqECqZhxwEoQjeXQS6Pg5JOwFhZY6xn8Gt9IN+vrJ5iIG6ph1Zv2a HfhrQbp8wxkQkpUI+PpCZW7eYWWlLc+aZoWQ1p+p8NX1Au1DgeTRo9nG3cgqLbd6 lR/sde9Ly5Ky7w6RF9xmk8QooPE/iWe9+viPP0LlVOhU++/8Kwh4QsR/W6nCBOsB yHCiIiz9sZFxxZDqSgdhw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedruddugddufeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedflfgvrghnqdeurghpthhishhtvgcumfgvmhhpfhdfuceo jhgssehvihguvgholhgrnhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieeigfdvffetke ekffdvieffieejtefhveetuedtgedvgeefkefgkedtleehfefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhgssehvihguvgholhgrnhdroh hrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 67F9715A0069; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 15:45:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-569-g7622ad95cc-fm-20220421.002-g7622ad95 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20220425184006.GZ2829255@pb2> References: <20220423163611.GX2829255@pb2> <9c39d56f-9cf0-4f81-9e13-4bc1034cac3b@beta.fastmail.com> <20220425171946.GY2829255@pb2> <20220425184006.GZ2829255@pb2> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:44:58 +0200 From: "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" To: ffmpeg-devel Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0 LTS vs 5.1 LTS X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >> >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> >> > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ? >> >> > Or something else ? >> >> >> >> My understanding of the consensus was; >> >> - 5.0 in Dec/Jan >> >> - 5.1 in Jul with API additions, but no ABI/behavior breakage >> > >> > yes >> >> OK. >> >> >> - 6.0 in Dec 22 with ABI/API/behavior breakage and while 5.1 becomes LTS >> > >> > we could give 5.1 an LTS "tag" when its released already >> >> I would mention it, tbh. >> >> > also thers the possibility that by december we have nothing that really >> > benefits from a ABI/API/behavior breakage. >> > If that happens people might prefer 5.2 over 6.0 i dont know. >> >> I think it would be clearer to accustom people that we have one big potential change every year, at the same date. > > thats not a bad idea. Still bumping the sonames of the libs when there is > no reason is not really nice. I dont know if we will have a reason in december A major number does not mean major soname bump if not needed. This is release numbers. -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".