From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E458450B5 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 04:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD0F68BE1C; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 06:32:12 +0200 (EET) Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org (mout-p-102.mailbox.org [80.241.56.152]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFC068BB64 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 06:32:04 +0200 (EET) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4P9Cyn4q86z9sbn for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 05:32:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 10:01:48 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <20230125010744.255455-1-stefasab@gmail.com> <29fe7152-55a9-8354-b018-60d4ac6e8681@gyani.pro> <20230206012523.GA338325@mariano> From: Gyan Doshi In-Reply-To: <20230206012523.GA338325@mariano> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4P9Cyn4q86z9sbn Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/ffmpeg: extend -dts_delta_threshold option description X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 2023-02-06 06:55 am, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > On date Wednesday 2023-01-25 10:47:20 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote: >> For copy_ts, it is still applied for all negative deltas except the >> smallest. > Which is a bit arbitrary. Possibly, but I imagine there was some trac ticket which prompted that handling. Does git blame shed any light? Regards, Gyan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".