From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B31814CBAE for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D87C68BE56; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:53:18 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com [209.85.167.49]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5607A68BC57 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:53:11 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-545054d78edso3713063e87.1 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:53:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=martin-st.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1739310790; x=1739915590; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3mbCrP2YNeq+InLXN14mcsiKS3w39CZw0/4JOAtpRF8=; b=QE28oNUt6aoSKiZNwR1kNNTVg42GMVBRcTkY1gmIcFlF1JPWe8BEbAU4BKhRgugZIa 4jh4UBKqO6qy4RN+7qVfSfsFNdG73+EAfFNVPx5JVYOQ4eRYJR6gDbKn/yeTyzaz5z9l npwPSWKsgJb89uyw1+d63zcUMBKRLLs7Ak8W84JyRcnKtC0bAsk16SkiwHiwBfAJiu05 /mbuuitieZOxTi7g3WxKXQ6vd4mqP5aqYl0X2JJe63gzlWev688BXzgEfmZzWyP3zJGt 7NWX0hm4Q+yH5BQlasBj6Fyrm7P4pqyS1f77drzCofreP1EPeTXIZYKT/GyM8dXRiZGx Pi7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739310790; x=1739915590; h=mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3mbCrP2YNeq+InLXN14mcsiKS3w39CZw0/4JOAtpRF8=; b=OVxxxvEN+B5LqUg01hgLi3a8eB2/YDjJUetFBvR7R1qLhzFIojN5bBR0exIvx8klYj Wpz6A/jHOGrsJKtlH90oQlgGootdsooWR8V82cp8KpPYUjP5LuNpoNaXJ9PTpOjyqwPB +8b9qBQajzw/nOtsxRB6qNxTSzM/7C362h+p8mhQJa26vwx7f74lY2/I5xXZQpwDBVs/ GEnsuOtWr/ifSq4lWCcsDwvCyhQNlUnHkrJqOQL/bW9WnU5AXoJYJKw04/TrXwtTRolH 0369NiwneBhIw78lhgBrYNBv7u9cqIioKtev6NGU8Mahern9Gas2edPP+zxbbWtK2fcR vnhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxz3SUeaJaewA9dOMN3tzUCLEa51TgTlSlMmpAxsBzjAwi5RFDP uFGmY20PL7lHVr5u6KZOUTIoJODWlhZ96thZeRWheeu6Qqf0x9QU8nOoJOQ/xY+Bc/qm3+vRALB JfQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuXVyb+jOKGgGbeYDaVr80PlYOVUoq6L4Phn4VCkuw5oTNipl736qhYbCjRKvt USOueZly6h5xWZVdIVlHa7JEUqI6YLUjlh1+iyhlc8fR4XGfJ//xibU0r0UKi/JQ3RSFZgksSi4 aXIdl/7I/9IQAev5OGeBht8UH1D5UH7r9rHrPXbEw5YkVbwxqPBtO5Vls/u4OK3fHeXRY+Trk/q dElrL0K0fh6W8W9tIpiwjEvlyYxCHcHt6HtARqlJL5sfEC0vCI1dnMQ/5P2qtSjdiECYddbYPfN VQxFVptRSFbJJWWSK++TCQpeATRW7PGb+qeHJkK6miIFre/Bu68mve9RjlBsrKPTJjoAf5v7/28 vcTj5mUGMYDQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHvmbAjS/XV+iKWhW0rujnmt80idZ4sEu702Szao3EM+t4aoXK35cKGqM1fsR9JvKDGRmpvkA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3581:b0:545:bda:f09 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5451818940amr136286e87.33.1739310789722; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:53:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from tunnel335574-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net (tunnel335574-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net. [2001:470:27:11::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-544105f2ef1sm1655927e87.188.2025.02.11.13.53.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:53:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:53:07 +0200 (EET) From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Storsj=F6?= To: Krzysztof Pyrkosz via ffmpeg-devel In-Reply-To: <20250211213349.115386-2-ffmpeg@szaka.eu> Message-ID: References: <6f582baf-e5db-8259-87ba-aed38bfe26ce@martin.st> <20250211213349.115386-2-ffmpeg@szaka.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] swscale/aarch64/rgb2rgb_neon: Implemented uyvytoyuv422 X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Krzysztof Pyrkosz Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Krzysztof Pyrkosz via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > I forgot to include the benchmarks in the previous message, here they > are: > > A78: > uyvytoyuv420_neon: 6112.5 ( 6.96x) > uyvytoyuv422_neon: 6696.0 ( 6.32x) > yuyvtoyuv420_neon: 6113.0 ( 6.95x) > yuyvtoyuv422_neon: 6695.2 ( 6.31x) > > A72: > uyvytoyuv420_neon: 9512.1 ( 6.09x) > uyvytoyuv422_neon: 9766.8 ( 6.32x) > yuyvtoyuv420_neon: 9639.1 ( 6.00x) > yuyvtoyuv422_neon: 9779.0 ( 6.03x) > > A53: > uyvytoyuv420_neon: 12720.1 ( 9.10x) > uyvytoyuv422_neon: 14282.9 ( 6.71x) > yuyvtoyuv420_neon: 12637.4 ( 9.15x) > yuyvtoyuv422_neon: 14127.6 ( 6.77x) > > --- > libswscale/aarch64/rgb2rgb.c | 16 ++ > libswscale/aarch64/rgb2rgb_neon.S | 262 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/checkasm/sw_rgb.c | 63 ++++--- > 3 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) Can you split out the checkasm changes to a separate preceding patch? That makes it easier to reason about it, regarding whether the new test coverage works for archs with existing asm, etc. // Martin _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".