From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD1F430AA for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7AF68B59D; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 23:59:36 +0300 (EEST) Received: from iq.passwd.hu (iq.passwd.hu [217.27.212.140]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11C668B43B for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 23:59:29 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iq.passwd.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AA5E73A6; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 22:59:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at passwd.hu Received: from iq.passwd.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (iq.passwd.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQpihUf0iwrz; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 22:59:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from iq (iq [217.27.212.140]) by iq.passwd.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E80FE73A5; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 22:59:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 22:59:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Marton Balint To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20220607113500.GU396728@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.1 X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Andreas Schneider Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Thu, 9 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:35 AM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: >> >> Hi all >> >> As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july >> That means in the next weeks probably! >> If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bugs, >> please help fixing them >> >> Also as was suggested before, this release will get the "LTS" tag >> unless people feel thats a bad idea of course >> > > There were a few fixes we have in Fedora on top of 5.0 that would be > nice to have in upstream 5.1: > > * http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-February/292877.html > * http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-February/292853.html > * http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-February/293194.html > > Would it be possible to make sure these are in? > These are already merged, except the last patch, which needs some further explanaition if this is cosmetic change or actually changes some behaviour (other than the possible user facing error message) Regards, Marton _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".