From: Alessandro Di Nepi <alessandro.dinepi@gmail.com>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc/videotoolbox: validate vt context in the decoder callback
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 18:30:41 +0200
Message-ID: <cf6f39d9-299c-4f2a-924f-ea3c10246b31@Spark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_89E0905B5635EF81FA34933F9F56919C8A09@qq.com>
Got you; giving some context here, and you can find all the details in the ticket #10079 (http://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10079).
The issue has been introduced with the commit d7f4ad88a0df3c1339e142957bf2c40cd056b8ce.
This patch basically changed:
• In the function `videotoolbox_start(AVCodecContext *avctx)`,
```
- decoder_cb.decompressionOutputRefCon = avctx;
+ decoder_cb.decompressionOutputRefCon = avctx->internal->hwaccel_priv_data;
```
• The context is retrieved in the function, `videotoolbox_decoder_callback(...)`
```
- AVCodecContext *avctx = opaque;
- VTContext *vtctx = avctx->internal->hwaccel_priv_data;
+ VTContext *vtctx = opaque;
```
Having said that, I see that when the `videotoolbox_start` is called,
• `avctx` is not NULL,
• `avctx->internal->hwaccel_priv_data` is NULL
The first time the `videotoolbox_decoder_callback` is called, `avctx->internal->hwaccel_priv_data` now has a value, so before d7f4ad88a `vtctx` has a value.
After the change, since `avctx->internal->hwaccel_priv_data` is captured in `video toolbox_start`, is NULL and `vtctx` is also NULL.
Again, this happens just the first time the callback is called; from the second time, vtctx has a proper value, and everything proceeds as expected.
I'm willing to change the patch if you think there is a better way, but something needs to be done because the library simply crashes in the current state.
From what I see from the original change, reverting is not an option.
Looking forward to hear feedback on this.
Best Regards
Alessandro
On 6 Dec 2022, 7:20 +0200, "zhilizhao(赵志立)" <quinkblack@foxmail.com>, wrote:
>
> > On Dec 5, 2022, at 21:36, Rick Kern <kernrj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 12:51 PM Alessandro Di Nepi <
> > alessandro.dinepi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 4 Dec 2022, 17:01 +0200, FFmpeg development discussions and patches <
> > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>, wrote:
> > > > When this happens, does it continue happening, or is it transient? My
> > > main
> > > > concern is log spamming.
> > > Good question: this is just a transient state, so that it won't continue
> > > happening.
> > > To give you some context: when the decoding start, the value of `vtctx` is
> > > captured "too" early so that the first time the callback is called, it's
> > > still NULL.
> > > The next time it will have a proper value.
> > >
> > If the code isn't setting a variable in time, that issue should be fixed.
> > Otherwise the decoder will drop frames.
>
> Yes, null pointer check doesn’t looks like a resolution to a race
> condition. I’m not sure how the race condition happened in the first
> place.
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-06 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-27 17:33 Alessandro Di Nepi
2022-11-29 16:46 ` Alessandro Di Nepi
2022-12-04 14:02 ` Alessandro Di Nepi
2022-12-04 15:00 ` Rick Kern
2022-12-04 17:51 ` Alessandro Di Nepi
2022-12-05 13:36 ` Rick Kern
2022-12-06 5:19 ` "zhilizhao(赵志立)"
2022-12-06 16:30 ` Alessandro Di Nepi [this message]
2022-12-09 4:44 ` "zhilizhao(赵志立)"
2022-12-11 9:57 ` Alessandro Di Nepi
2022-12-15 14:16 ` Alessandro Di Nepi
2022-12-15 14:45 ` Zhao Zhili
2023-01-09 14:48 ` Zhao Zhili
[not found] <53dafc80-d9f6-4b5b-a7a5-781bbb045493@Spark>
2022-11-27 16:21 ` Alessandro Di Nepi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf6f39d9-299c-4f2a-924f-ea3c10246b31@Spark \
--to=alessandro.dinepi@gmail.com \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git