On 07/02/2025 20:42, Krzysztof Pyrkosz via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > This change removes one extra floating point operation and simplifies > load operations at the beginning of the loop by using dedicated register > for each of the 5 pointers and interleaving it with calculations. The > first case seems to be a bit slower, but the performance increase is > substantial in the other two. > > A78 before: > postfilter_15_neon: 1684.8 ( 4.23x) > postfilter_512_neon: 1395.5 ( 5.10x) > postfilter_1022_neon: 1357.0 ( 5.25x) > > After: > postfilter_15_neon: 1742.2 ( 4.09x) > postfilter_512_neon: 1169.8 ( 6.09x) > postfilter_1022_neon: 1160.0 ( 6.12x) > > > A72 before: > postfilter_15_neon: 3144.8 ( 2.39x) > postfilter_512_neon: 3141.2 ( 2.39x) > postfilter_1022_neon: 3230.0 ( 2.33x) > > After: > postfilter_15_neon: 2847.8 ( 2.64x) > postfilter_512_neon: 2877.8 ( 2.61x) > postfilter_1022_neon: 2837.2 ( 2.65x) > > > x13s before: > postfilter_15_neon: 1615.4 ( 2.61x) > postfilter_512_neon: 963.1 ( 4.39x) > postfilter_1022_neon: 963.6 ( 4.39x) > > After: > postfilter_15_neon: 1749.6 ( 2.41x) > postfilter_512_neon: 707.1 ( 5.97x) > postfilter_1022_neon: 706.1 ( 5.99x) > > > Krzysztof > > --- > libavcodec/aarch64/opusdsp_neon.S | 31 ++++++++++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libavcodec/aarch64/opusdsp_neon.S b/libavcodec/aarch64/opusdsp_neon.S > index 253825aa61..990fc44c70 100644 > --- a/libavcodec/aarch64/opusdsp_neon.S > +++ b/libavcodec/aarch64/opusdsp_neon.S > @@ -55,35 +55,28 @@ endfunc > > function ff_opus_postfilter_neon, export=1 > ld1 {v0.4s}, [x2] > + sub x5, x0, w1, sxtw #2 > + sub x1, x5, #8 > dup v1.4s, v0.s[1] > dup v2.4s, v0.s[2] > dup v0.4s, v0.s[0] > > - add w1, w1, #2 > - sub x1, x0, x1, lsl #2 > - > - ld1 {v3.4s}, [x1] > + ld1 {v3.4s}, [x1], #16 > + sub x4, x5, #4 > + add x6, x5, #4 > fmul v3.4s, v3.4s, v2.4s > > -1: add x1, x1, #4 > - ld1 {v4.4s}, [x1] > - add x1, x1, #4 > - ld1 {v5.4s}, [x1] > - add x1, x1, #4 > - ld1 {v6.4s}, [x1] > - add x1, x1, #4 > - ld1 {v7.4s}, [x1] > - > +1: ld1 {v7.4s}, [x1], #16 > + ld1 {v4.4s}, [x4], #16 > fmla v3.4s, v7.4s, v2.4s > + ld1 {v6.4s}, [x6], #16 > + ld1 {v5.4s}, [x5], #16 > fadd v6.4s, v6.4s, v4.4s > + fmla v3.4s, v5.4s, v0.4s > > ld1 {v4.4s}, [x0] > - fmla v4.4s, v5.4s, v0.4s > - > - fmul v6.4s, v6.4s, v1.4s > - fadd v6.4s, v6.4s, v3.4s > - > - fadd v4.4s, v4.4s, v6.4s > + fmla v3.4s, v6.4s, v1.4s > + fadd v4.4s, v4.4s, v3.4s > fmul v3.4s, v7.4s, v2.4s > > st1 {v4.4s}, [x0], #16 This function was written and optimized for A53 cores. The fmla chain is very performance sensitive on in-order CPUs? Could you post a perf difference from an in-order CPU?