From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100B64BACF for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 04:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AEA68D08B; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 07:01:16 +0300 (EEST) Received: from vidala.pars.ee (vidala.pars.ee [116.203.72.101]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D6568CD28 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 07:01:09 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=202405r; d=lynne.ee; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID; t=1753243268; bh=gPG9NfPlB/aGHxZic9FSA8O 4Ynhr0At/u7EPYszbXI8=; b=h3Civ2MU/cx4eMq4R3d38pf1gwVmPkfRkTFniTNhlbRbBR62g5 zK/N+SGuDHxaOIJYLp5fBfYXEqudqgtjFNW67blBtTmyoFeqAVM9baSRlivqs6zE6/jn/bLW1iy UY9PC+ZzOUXOun9HYO53BvZIX2z7ngfdVgsQ5xFPJXnSB3jcJBl+LSAIoKJZQmkuR0sNIEEWlO9 nh8rANathYTcmCQ+LRP8m4I6gGZBRca1zbSClNuhnhN39jAeB192DFzF9QLZ52IvsU693Z+YxKO hHG0qbjkY9Tc3IlAVLdPBp1ixqJmuc7I66f2zRV7ZIOXoERtE4ow3fSC1jbuk5+iLDg==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; s=202405e; d=lynne.ee; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID; t=1753243268; bh=gPG9NfPlB/aGHxZic9FSA8O 4Ynhr0At/u7EPYszbXI8=; b=86plid9Ur5y9mRhgaq6nXDx43nDgD5ktfsW3XWyTrWcQNnRmsu YdyZl0tArW7dMmlQNL258unNxuTECsRPpfBg==; Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:01:06 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <20250722035337.2216565-1-dev@lynne.ee> <20250722230434.GG29660@pb2> Content-Language: en-US From: Lynne In-Reply-To: <20250722230434.GG29660@pb2> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] web: announce code.ffmpeg.org X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 23/07/2025 08:04, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Lynne > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 12:53:29PM +0900, Lynne wrote: > > [...] > >> +

>> + Bugs/issues will be accepted on code.ffmpeg.org, alongside >> + with trac.ffmpeg.org for the time being. >> +

> > People should not submit bug reports randomly to 2 trackers, thats a problem. > It would make searching for issues 2x as hard. > > If we discuss and decide to change the bug tracker (which we have not discussed, > less decided) -> than we should import all the issues from trac into the new tracker first. > > In fact i suggest we make the forgejo issue tracker forward people to trac currently I disagree, I think we need a fresh start to track bugs properly. BtbN suggested he could redirect the new issue button on trac to Forgejo. >> +

>> + We are also hoping that this will significantly reduce the amount of unmerged patches. >> + If you submitted a patch which received no replies or conclusion, we apologize, and you are encouraged >> + to resubmit it on the new platform. >> +

> > The announcment should probably mention that performance, as in number of > submissions / percentage of applied / not reviewed patches will be > monitored compared to the mailing list. > > (and obviously someone has to do that, i do think such basic performance > monitoring is important after/ during such a change) > > later then (in a month or whatever) we should make an announcment with > the performance numbers We all know there were plenty of patches left over. What we need to do is to start earning back the trust of casual submitters by at least letting them know that patches which might have gotten lost will get a second chance. I already included data which hints at how many patches were left out in the form of ML vs patchwork stats. > [And if we want to have strong statistics, then it is neccessary > to pre-announce _exactly_ when and what will be meassured how. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preregistration_(science) ] > > just thought this would be a interresting subject for a statistics paper, > if someone (maybe outside the ffmpeg team) wants to do it ... We could announce it later once we open the gates and start gathering data. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".