From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256D343D73 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BB668B7F8; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:44:28 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [80.241.56.171]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37DDC68B636 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:44:22 +0300 (EEST) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4M2B7759vQz9sRx for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:44:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:14:08 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <20220809083015.68AB5411A20@natalya.videolan.org> <166003649799.3205.7975552149520960827@lain.khirnov.net> <166003724232.10012.11753014702349860785@lain.khirnov.net> From: Gyan Doshi In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4M2B7759vQz9sRx Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [FFmpeg-cvslog] doc/filters: clarify behaviour of weights in amix X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 2022-08-09 04:55 pm, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 12:46 PM Gyan Doshi wrote: >> >> >> On 2022-08-09 04:00 pm, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 5:36 PM Gyan Doshi wrote: >>> >>>> On 2022-08-09 02:57 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote: >>>>> Quoting Gyan Doshi (2022-08-09 11:22:39) >>>>>> I am a docs maintainer so I push these directly. >>>>> All patches should go through the mailing list, so other people get the >>>>> opportunity to comment on them. >>>> I do that for more extensive changes. >>>> >>>> As the guidelines say, >>>> >>>> "Send your changes as patches to the ffmpeg-devel mailing list >>> and >>> >>> >>> if >>>> the code maintainers say OK, you may commit. This does not apply to >>>> files you wrote and/or maintain." >>> That should make the intent of the sentence quoted clear. >> 'This' refers to the entire preceding sentence. If it was otherwise, it >> would be incompatible with the 2nd way mentioned at >> http://www.ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Contributing >> >> I'm not wedded to the policy as stated in the current docs, but the >> current docs are clear that maintainers can push directly. >> > If several people disagree on the interpretation, its clearly not as > "clear" as you claim it to be. Yes, but only one person (Ronald) disagreed. Anton said it was outdated. But your objection is weird considering that Ronald affirmed that the intent was clear. That intent just happens to be opposite to what I think it is. This continued discussion is pointless. All this needs is a patch for what the new unambiguous policy should be. Regards, Gyan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".