Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Carotti, Elias" <eliascrt@amazon.it>
To: "ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org" <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Optimization: support for libx264's mb_info
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 17:23:05 +0000
Message-ID: <c6814bcd7c1d14b84e1465792936aea6a25d733b.camel@amazon.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168742346237.21886.2119907118968452752@lain.khirnov.net>

On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 10:44 +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender
> and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> Quoting Carotti, Elias (2023-06-21 17:53:09)
> > +
> > +    /**
> > +     * Provide macro block encoder-specific hinting information
> > for the encoder
> > +     * processing.  It can be used to pass information about which
> > macroblock
> > +     * can be skipped because it hasn't changed from the
> > corresponding one in
> > +     * the previous frame. This is useful for applications which
> > know in
> > +     * advance this information to speed up real-time encoding. 
> > Currently only
> > +     * used by libx264.
> 
> I'd avoid any such claims here, because this comment will certainly
> not
> be kept up to date.


Agreed. It was more a statement than a claim, since I only implemented
that :-)

> 
> > +/**
> > + * Allocate memory for a vector of AVVideoRect in the given
> > AVFrame
> > + * {@code frame} as AVFrameSideData of type
> > AV_FRAME_DATA_VIDEO_HINT_INFO.
> > + * The side data contains a list of rectangles for the portions of
> > the frame
> > + * which changed from the last encoded one (and the remainder are
> > assumed to be
> > + * changed), or, alternately (depending on the type parameter) the
> > unchanged
> > + * ones (and the remanining ones are those which changed).
> > + * Macroblocks will thus be hinted either to be P_SKIP-ped or go
> > through the
> > + * regular encoding procedure.
> > + */
> > +AVVideoHint *av_video_hint_create_side_data(AVFrame *frame,
> > +                                            AVVideoRect *rects,
> > +                                            size_t num_rects,
> > +                                            AVVideoHintType type);
> > +
> > +AVVideoHint *av_video_hint_alloc(AVVideoRect *rects,
> > +                                 size_t nb_rects,
> > +                                 AVVideoHintType type,
> > +                                 size_t *out_size);
> 
> If AVVideoHint is extended in the future, you will have a weird
> situation where some fields are set by the allocation function, while
> others have to be set manually by the caller.
> 
> You're also assuming the caller has an explicit array of AVVideoRect,
> while they may actually want to fill them in through some other
> means.

I agree on the first issue, and yes, it would be wiser to split the
allocation function from a the setting function. 
Would a simple append_rectangles (the name may be different) API work
for you?

I am not clear on the second issue you raise though: the thing is that
this side information is only needed per frame and before encoding, so
I do not see a use case where you keep adding rectangles to this side
data. The use case I see is where you accumulate the rectangles and
then feed them to the encoding function and forget about them, however,
again, if we add an append_rectangles we could easily extend it to the
use case you're hinting at.

> 
> Finally, it still seems to me this is largely duplicating
> AVVideoEncParams and you could get your functionality by adding your
> AVVideoHintType there.
> 

I disagree on this last point. My first idea to avoid duplicating or
adding unnecessary code was indeed to extend AVVideoEncParams. However,
(please correct me if I am wrong,) to my undestanding the
AVVideoEncParams are currently only used at the *decoder* side to
convey the encoding parameters (extracted from the bitstream) used by
the encoder to produce a stream while here we want to work the other
way around: at the encoder's side to provide hints on how to encode a
frame but won't affect the bitstream (aside from inducing faster
P_SKIPs generation.) and won't be known at the decoder's side.

So it seems to me it's a different semantics for which it's better to
have an appropriate side information.

Best, 
Elias
  

> --
> Anton Khirnov
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".




NICE SRL, viale Monte Grappa 3/5, 20124 Milano, Italia, Registro delle Imprese di Milano Monza Brianza Lodi REA n. 2096882, Capitale Sociale: 10.329,14 EUR i.v., Cod. Fisc. e P.IVA 01133050052, Societa con Socio Unico


_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-22 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-19 10:19 Carotti, Elias
2023-05-21 23:17 ` Stefano Sabatini
2023-05-22  9:19   ` Carotti, Elias
2023-05-29 17:56     ` Carotti, Elias
2023-06-04 15:29       ` Stefano Sabatini
2023-06-05 15:32         ` Carotti, Elias
2023-06-11 17:15           ` Stefano Sabatini
2023-06-12  8:23             ` Kieran Kunhya
2023-06-12 17:38               ` Carotti, Elias
2023-06-18 10:04                 ` Stefano Sabatini
2023-06-12 17:28             ` Carotti, Elias
2023-06-18 10:18               ` Stefano Sabatini
2023-06-21 15:53                 ` Carotti, Elias
2023-06-22  8:44                   ` Anton Khirnov
2023-06-22 17:23                     ` Carotti, Elias [this message]
2023-06-24 11:01                       ` Anton Khirnov
2023-06-26  9:50                         ` Carotti, Elias
2023-06-28 12:55                           ` Anton Khirnov
2023-06-30 17:40                             ` Carotti, Elias
2023-07-01  8:33                               ` Anton Khirnov
2023-07-03 15:51                                 ` Carotti, Elias
2023-07-07 16:27                                   ` Carotti, Elias
2023-07-09 11:05                                     ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavu: add AVVideoHint API Anton Khirnov
2023-07-09 13:10                                       ` Lynne
2023-07-10  8:13                                         ` Carotti, Elias
2023-07-10 12:51                                           ` Carotti, Elias
2023-07-17 22:19                                             ` Stefano Sabatini
2023-07-23 23:27                                               ` Stefano Sabatini
2023-07-26 10:52                                                 ` Carotti, Elias
2023-07-28  7:44                                                   ` Stefano Sabatini
2023-08-02  5:36                                                     ` Stefano Sabatini
2023-08-08  8:16                                                       ` Stefano Sabatini
2023-07-10  8:09                                       ` Carotti, Elias

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c6814bcd7c1d14b84e1465792936aea6a25d733b.camel@amazon.it \
    --to=eliascrt@amazon.it \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git