Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Bump major version of swresample

[James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>]

On 2/27/2023 7:03 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> essOn Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 12:03:02AM +0800, Wang Bin wrote:
>>
> 
>>   version_major.h |    2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> a87056c2fe65d68b2cf5d1de06be28ea40c69b73  0001-Bump-major-version-of-swresample.patch
>>  From e3e6a3833f2fba743ee9c05962e804e9e570dd75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: wang-bin <wbsecg1@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 23:54:51 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] Bump major version of swresample
>>
>> ---
>>   libswresample/version_major.h | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libswresample/version_major.h b/libswresample/version_major.h
>> index 7f265c2073..dd13f2bbe3 100644
>> --- a/libswresample/version_major.h
>> +++ b/libswresample/version_major.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@
>>    * Libswresample version macros
>>    */
>>   
>> -#define LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MAJOR   4
>> +#define LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MAJOR   5
> 
> No oppinion if this should be changed now before 6.0 or not
> but if its done it should be done on master and release/6.0 at the same time
> and LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MINOR needs to be reset too while
> LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MINOR needs to be +1 on master compared to release/6.0
> 
> oppinon from others is welcome here. Iam not a user of the releases so its
> hard for me to really guess which way is better. Its a little messy to
> change now
> 
> thx

I don't think it's a good idea to do it now. No API was removed from it 
so leaving the major as is should be fine.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".