From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E047F43AC7 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 19:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B525C68B93A; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 22:18:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com (mail-wr1-f46.google.com [209.85.221.46]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E9AE68B77F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 22:18:14 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id z17so22356366wrq.4 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:18:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc; bh=VDFCNJTIYPtmhQfRZA3IGOzrsHi2fzhqgt12OyE4Xbw=; b=jLFHxj7eCtimX/zKkS7OieP4g5pMxiqqE9GbvEp8bJIP+4Tz/5eBAVy7eGgy31+Xld LFhrkoBSmA75EDgIN7H5tmErl6GHuAxpK1xWoup87VnWGj/3sAsxApEo4E9W8QeWbCbw xGNXbjNtWKs4Zd1DAlEj+nuZFdQsZlAhJg6mlO/0fivDIlUlKz8BPca0ix3GNAh/yW4h iglmY2QcD9eHOoR2FJ+3O+g6b04glNL5rZ9MiI+f099F8B9r6IH6i6FS/mPCnwFtinVV Ec0kmRp+VVMp3ZPiNhFAWTcCJiCB6lg6zHT+Xfp9arlFL0JT62lWUzA3FNJd0iscHz99 cE+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc; bh=VDFCNJTIYPtmhQfRZA3IGOzrsHi2fzhqgt12OyE4Xbw=; b=AYkpxtANx+LzZWGaMDSInWlF1xpd1SfOgOEmiEgdROEcUMYLKiXztxXmDQirgQzujZ Tin3O5uzPH8fMN5A+4SURK3RVGoPvPRRyMYo3p5u0B2NQgIPkFpwUKFCWE1/IvraouGo rVYhvDnkGRpoLONK5XOSa1SSSubjAZveJ4dN3y1RIdXPrmSlL/XMNdccVeRxMAabsjQL Vk70gc+5Wa9SNNR+aa3POKrijhjUAOxujYMx3XSKyZkz1vHWN9YwZ5uLKCmzSXDXgH3D VH953kJ9858oOZGC3eciwN73/0g+yB0m3OPbzBrbclwDYMTz/mzTw0Sf5DMQDRDCvVnA n2vw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0swHT32C2zqSrMsEjWECRaFUZEriLWhwM/lVWm5ygAg5VuBVEp Qt5+9oQaCCj6zwkFNmKKm2LWQb/zCYk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7kco9FzK+AcUGBa9T7yK/Mk0MS0aC4I79fJRLvMYs38wc1lP0vWfok9ITbc0uu1cqieiaVdQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:48c8:0:b0:21e:5134:c78c with SMTP id p8-20020a5d48c8000000b0021e5134c78cmr223325wrs.233.1660245493446; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.106] ([149.12.10.163]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l23-20020a05600c2cd700b003a32167b8d4sm7823384wmc.13.2022.08.11.12.18.12 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 20:18:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <20220810222708.186270-1-derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com> <612e12d2-4df2-a2fc-5560-7acd93c2fc8f@rothenpieler.org> From: Derek Buitenhuis In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ipfsgateway: Remove default gateway X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 8/11/2022 6:56 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote: > This is just your - valued! - opinion, but still just 1. I insist on > waiting to hear from Michael to hear a decision on this, mainly because he > was quite persistent in asking for this feature to begin with. > The risks were clear and - somewhat - mentioned in the post I linked to > before yet the decision was still to proceed. This is a bigger issue than a single person's opinion - it's just plainly an unacceptable risk. I totally agree with Timo here. 'Just works' isn't an acceptbale reason to ship a hard coded third party sever as part of a widely used FOS library and tool. I admit I was large absent from the original (many) rounds or review, but I'm kind of surprised it was merged as-is, to be honest. Frankly either it should've been merged as "batteries not included", or should have been a whole IPFS implementation. However, regardless of how this came to be (whether reasonable or not), this should be removed. -Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".