From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3FD49346 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 04:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CA168CA52; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 06:29:57 +0200 (EET) Received: from wfhigh1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfhigh1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.152]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A069B68CE03 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 06:29:50 +0200 (EET) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEC2180006E; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 23:29:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap49 ([10.202.2.99]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 07 Feb 2024 23:29:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1707366586; x=1707452986; bh=H4WB8DBdsTK3BOkQ2DR+YkKSi6Wf TyqViIpRCflJ1Xw=; b=PeGK/6oq3rmlVdqd5S3itwF4FQkJYuZ6FIVMaO36FCk3 0ATg6CvzjLWYoB3JuYCjI6A43HCUeCd0mQHglySAAs6NTSWf8QijOAOwKOmoa0cG cis7mU67r4YvZM2uEuKYxFYAbHi+K+IDuXMDmf3POxSDviceAEPQW/A7soe2snwa O0dK55PDYeZg08mcu2k4iPjl1VDVKrCchhiajxSs6ennO5qsxJpXSW4vQ4ejemNB YvB+quFqGDNafJaCDSObLEcoagdhYik8cl5bprSjj6sTXAEkrZiDlrd1g+0n3NEt ywmXn3lmXIQ52SXh4lvNzwtAPrvq4fD/gkHux1YUsw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrtdefgdejvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdflvggr nhdquegrphhtihhsthgvucfmvghmphhffdcuoehjsgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrdhorhhgqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetfedvffehvdehheeiudettefgveduhfdvgeelheefvdel ueduiefgjeelteeljeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehjsgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i06904239:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1A50115A0092; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 23:29:45 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-144-ge5821d614e-fm-20240125.002-ge5821d61 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <0101018d86255500-5b78df10-2b31-45ae-8a0a-3965f641453f-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <20240205195802.14522-2-anton@khirnov.net> <20240205202727.GT6420@pb2> <170716510563.8914.15857303686551471840@lain.khirnov.net> <20240205204510.GU6420@pb2> <170729971000.8914.8781282694582073579@lain.khirnov.net> <2E73439B-3AE5-46FC-80FB-2D375FD852C5@cosmin.at> <0101018d84ea30db-c4e65518-ce86-436d-8a69-df75847f7c8d-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <1CBFE199-B1ED-47B5-BD97-7DA715EAB55B@cosmin.at> <0101018d8568a406-3e21bde1-a8ac-477a-a2fa-05be3c8461f4-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <8C790A7E-A236-4413-A4EB-AFE2F91E96A8@cosmin.at> <0101018d86255500-5b78df10-2b31-45ae-8a0a-3965f641453f-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 05:29:25 +0100 From: "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" To: ffmpeg-devel Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Require compilers to support C17. X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Cosmin Stejerean Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hello, On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, at 01:36, Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel wrote: >> There were simply no objections to moving to C11. >> The C17 plan came about later because it has important bugfixes. >> It doesn't really matter as compilers backported the new behaviour to C11 >> (or rather, they consistently had the same behaviour, but now it became a standard). >> > > There were no objections to C11, however C17 was brought up and there > were objections that it's likely too soon and I believe JB proposed > holding off for a year on C17 (while adopting C11 immediately), which My recommendation is still this: - move to C11 now - activate C17 on some Fate/CI targets - recommend C17 compilers modes - move to C17 at this mid-year when 7.1 is branched (LTS if we follow our plans) -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".