Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Thompson <sw@jkqxz.net>
To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/cbs_apv: don't return an error when reading empty buffers
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:17:26 +0100
Message-ID: <af60e860-4ded-45d7-a50d-14f12dd422a2@jkqxz.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429195738.829-1-jamrial@gmail.com>

On 29/04/2025 20:57, James Almer wrote:
> The output will be a fragment with zero units, which is a lot more user friendly
> than making them think something went wrong, as it already happens with cbs_av1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
> ---
>  libavcodec/cbs_apv.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libavcodec/cbs_apv.c b/libavcodec/cbs_apv.c
> index 2c4a1daaf0..66ea4cebab 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/cbs_apv.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/cbs_apv.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int cbs_apv_split_fragment(CodedBitstreamContext *ctx,
>  
>      if (frag->data_size < 4) {
>          // Too small to be a valid fragment.
> -        return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
> +        return 0;
>      }
>  
>      // Don't include parsing here in trace output.

Seems fair for a zero-size buffer, but I don't like this for a three-byte fragment containing { 0xab, 0xcd, 0xef } - that feels like it should return an error.

Maybe it would make more sense to have a separate check for zero.  What do you think?

Thanks,

- Mark

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-30 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29 19:57 James Almer
2025-04-30 21:17 ` Mark Thompson [this message]
2025-04-30 21:18   ` James Almer
2025-04-30 21:22   ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] " James Almer
2025-04-30 22:13     ` Mark Thompson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af60e860-4ded-45d7-a50d-14f12dd422a2@jkqxz.net \
    --to=sw@jkqxz.net \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git