From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CD845361 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 20:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0861C68BD99; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:45:26 +0200 (EET) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (unknown [64.147.123.21]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D20868BABF for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:45:20 +0200 (EET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E523200956 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:45:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap49 ([10.202.2.99]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:45:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1674679517; x=1674765917; bh=IluTabRvRCLeDVIm5g1skOCQO0/h 0AQma4bxiLF2B4Q=; b=cE8V9dLcxCo75H9ihpBKjpFFcO/Bbxr3wk2gEbVjT3wm b8M24QEySnS6b8vhoMaA9daifn8yrqnG832b9OmK8qj3iXAT4/83FNkxVV2Ig9g3 KaeWZO3wiuiIGty4wN0chrLX4jhTDSCsKk7c2M/ZjOnk47J0TwMwKaXwiVCqniO4 nut4oYNdx35jzVbF6BBbtD9P9xH3BtGcHxLaH1gc+CV58PfCT8OulziEfwuPHAe9 yH8mCMVKZKG7E/icKaZWfMvdKkqRX7gFkcKBVgBUP5SoaHTshqNdMxr/+VMsYBdf 3UdvqKSfFHdE+q+Qt93ZgK6VWibv1S+vIqMxMzaE8Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedruddvvddgudegvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdflvggrnhdquegrphhtihhsthgvucfmvghmphhffdcu oehjsgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiiefgvdffte ekkeffvdeiffeijeethfevteeutdegvdegfeekgfektdelheefgfenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjsgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrd horhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i06904239:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 795BD15A008E; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:45:16 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-85-gd6d859e0cf-fm-20230116.001-gd6d859e0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <7debdfb5-bbb3-e4c6-f95-a89a463d3abd@passwd.hu> References: <20230116133840.512-1-jamrial@gmail.com> <167457514256.4503.7425182589774123747@lain.khirnov.net> <6b01240d-95e2-db84-c40b-329a72b958c5@gmail.com> <7debdfb5-bbb3-e4c6-f95-a89a463d3abd@passwd.hu> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:44:55 +0100 From: "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" To: ffmpeg-devel Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 00/26] Major library version bump X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 21:08, Marton Balint wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, James Almer wrote: > >> On 1/24/2023 12:45 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: >>> So to summarize the discussion so far: >>> >>> * nobody is strongly arguing for an instability period after the bump, >>> and there are good reasons against it, therefore we should NOT have >>> one >>> >>> * the bump can be done either as bump-then-remove or remove-then-bump >>> * there are advantages and disadvantages for both of those, nobody >>> expressed a strong preference for either, so you can keep this as >>> is >>> >>> Please correct me if I misunderstood or missed something, or somebody >>> has a new opinion. >> >> Since the instability period doesn't seem popular, if anyone has some patches >> for ABI changes (enum value or field offset changes, removing avpriv_ >> functions we forgot about, etc), then please send them asap so i can push >> them all at the same time. > > Ok, I can send the frame number changes tomorrow. When do you plan to do > the actual bump? I assumed the last 5.x release should be branched first. Why? 5.1 was already branched out. I would Bump and prepare 6.0 just after, no? -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".