From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C3B45369 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F6568BE0B; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 23:27:31 +0200 (EET) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4F568BDE9 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 23:27:24 +0200 (EET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FBE32003C0 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:27:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap49 ([10.202.2.99]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:27:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1674682042; x=1674768442; bh=GiqY11Dw9j3Z6Ncam8tH6R9t8sp9 /h5Mgg5gEzYTZmw=; b=Xeel7wpukAcpSIuBUzuLjWIVnUhkpd53juiZh3tPVPoY 2hQXL8p/hoitM4ZGUDfI92CK50A7JEgpVRC2IrHIOxV5N4Yd/N05r0BSVcNW1l0m UQkiqoXyvEZ+twG0EYC35muTTXp0NOVqZep9xWnlPGKVN7r/3AEj2Pa7o/rYpFE2 OqJuk53GJLwEkqH+sGQ+21CnQJyAch17BRLF/xnuYLvVSKWp3sAj8Fe28LZuhw/H UEyaSeBIpuGNJYgkaoQZ+1VtXMs6XXuSEY88EX7I9Qs9jrKYds7mLjOTiBsdaBEU gyRcNrDGoPmhFDr2fcO7DzYo98p9Lvv7aNwvoOXfCQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedruddvvddgudehudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdflvggrnhdquegrphhtihhsthgvucfmvghmphhffdcu oehjsgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiiefgvdffte ekkeffvdeiffeijeethfevteeutdegvdegfeekgfektdelheefgfenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjsgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrd horhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i06904239:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3061615A008E; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:27:22 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-85-gd6d859e0cf-fm-20230116.001-gd6d859e0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20230116133840.512-1-jamrial@gmail.com> <167457514256.4503.7425182589774123747@lain.khirnov.net> <6b01240d-95e2-db84-c40b-329a72b958c5@gmail.com> <7debdfb5-bbb3-e4c6-f95-a89a463d3abd@passwd.hu> <4997c7ce-3db3-4062-b3b4-f65719debc43@betaapp.fastmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:26:59 +0100 From: "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" To: ffmpeg-devel Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 00/26] Major library version bump X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 22:20, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 1/25/23, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 22:03, Marton Balint wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 21:08, Marton Balint wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, James Almer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/24/2023 12:45 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: >>>>>>> So to summarize the discussion so far: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * nobody is strongly arguing for an instability period after the >>>>>>> bump, >>>>>>> and there are good reasons against it, therefore we should NOT >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> one >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * the bump can be done either as bump-then-remove or >>>>>>> remove-then-bump >>>>>>> * there are advantages and disadvantages for both of those, >>>>>>> nobody >>>>>>> expressed a strong preference for either, so you can keep this >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please correct me if I misunderstood or missed something, or >>>>>>> somebody >>>>>>> has a new opinion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since the instability period doesn't seem popular, if anyone has some >>>>>> patches >>>>>> for ABI changes (enum value or field offset changes, removing avpriv_ >>>>>> functions we forgot about, etc), then please send them asap so i can >>>>>> push >>>>>> them all at the same time. >>>>> >>>>> Ok, I can send the frame number changes tomorrow. When do you plan to >>>>> do >>>>> the actual bump? I assumed the last 5.x release should be branched >>>>> first. >>>> >>>> Why? 5.1 was already branched out. >>> >>> And is missing 6 months of development. >> >> So you want us to release both 6.0 and 5.2 at the same time? >> I don't get it. > > So user do not need to immediately update code that uses old API to > get new fancy features. And when do you stop doing this? Also, as 5.1 is LTS, is 5.2 LTS too? -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".