From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE0D248CE7 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 23:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: ffbox; dkim=fail (body hash mismatch (got b'Vwh4PalGKshllyKtKsJQVYhhffWwchKUjh84HKqgdRA=', expected b'GZ2tFrmycJ9leF1G75C5tFzkapzE2H1IazpAx9hEEYk=')) header.d=niedermayer.cc header.a=rsa-sha256 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ffmpeg.org; i=@ffmpeg.org; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1761003068; h=date : to : message-id : references : mime-version : in-reply-to : reply-to : subject : list-id : list-archive : list-archive : list-help : list-owner : list-post : list-subscribe : list-unsubscribe : from : cc : content-type : from; bh=Xu02OfBiN4elSqCewDMDlZh3SZHs2H+/KcQ7IdkNYnU=; b=cO2xy2ORt3r/0loB9TnJRUCtM9Rb6gy5Uv19XGZPwAV7KGUIj1N0FjH5k2fyOcQ4+1mMC OCFDEF9C2im/ir2CE0AWuPY9iyBz144jklulzKsRdd7ENssEQmhW3zvZxVEKD64XTrEotUs GqjChym3avj5/4cK+PNVTVXO9frFZ6QoSKqjiSWMfpuvDHjJkr5CwkuU0U2aO4vFokQyt/a 0+4M3JiHp9MEpYlxNKTCwjeHgg5xDmy6TnRWIY2uz9y842bbZ9bOuamjhAIai3xZPRjCr42 Ohea5+h4tNWMx/4ISRICmjTzMcXpywi/pEjwgFOLSXS37pBS6dsyXf/ngOrA== Received: from [172.19.0.2] (unknown [172.19.0.2]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F66A68F501; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 02:31:08 +0300 (EEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=ffmpeg.org; s=arc; t=1761003048; b=LRQ2c34BD4i4fQ27R38WWDkKQrvYD7tvpZOnvIt0+oaZ0rC6uwACoJFdNQioJ61OnE3GE np0bnemXpqVd/6nAOcHfvnWrziqaiJxGxbrt1W0OwUF2vZ7lSz+RS49NWkB6L3jrX6Qe4ns NDJi8SrT/SPCHbZnZS9z7ZULWtZvZuJ6SEFQ3VRHvT5tisHidVYGoZ304uvdyybDdzj+Lsg xkyc/wC49EqMexDnj09MIlHpkk39rO7teGDGVXP/0coZRojWx7WN7w4JRgIxtqC49pMXvpD Q2ec0dJANfK0P1/lS5e/qPcsGgGYl6QWjjABaJ3Yf5yWNK99aguTdCldOFGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffmpeg.org; s=arc; t=1761003048; h=from : sender : reply-to : subject : date : message-id : to : cc : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : content-id : content-description : resent-date : resent-from : resent-sender : resent-to : resent-cc : resent-message-id : in-reply-to : references : list-id : list-help : list-unsubscribe : list-subscribe : list-post : list-owner : list-archive; bh=Vwh4PalGKshllyKtKsJQVYhhffWwchKUjh84HKqgdRA=; b=dTfY3N6A2P029uHcO0d+88u3L3dcr3OEvnaZ3Cdr42VSBqAUeiNaaDn0byPLho7KoxP1Z rw2fzajyy5Gn1rm+n34kujXy4FMQQ4BHXdAHwdH60nVEySwgAkkqJxzl3BSC1G1yTolE/81 rMVBcL6D7AMBxfQ8kFFlORpmjM+obIu1Jnt35Q7GkxjJpI3lAn8Qy/RJl5UEdiesdNMsD8r hlBb5VwFmxqCbkZMOxqRfJEXndwsBBX6FfgzrQVPKXvOrPhQUfy7pDgBdJuHQdBUy5YnoQV +z4R2IMuvWqSQOha2is33o5V/azNSiDxEj8DtwG8eziaGwa/XrwWbaFtUfLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; ffmpeg.org; dkim=pass header.d=niedermayer.cc; arc=none; dmarc=none Authentication-Results: ffmpeg.org; dkim=pass header.d=niedermayer.cc; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=none Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEC3B687B8E for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 02:30:35 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B23143D31 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 23:30:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=niedermayer.cc; s=gm1; t=1761003035; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GZ2tFrmycJ9leF1G75C5tFzkapzE2H1IazpAx9hEEYk=; b=lCuR8fmCc02A9QMxPfBJYhsXKFOm0z+vbreN+9H3V5tIrcQUlJnIvqs7yeIBRz835L517M 4YbcxMAT84mvTQQYDzB+pmFdDluQz0yPqeTIYfSirivyuB34vTiHm9vDKwGAKsEnbLjBfH btonBQKv1tKdOMigQ2HFiJeA0Wkhxoyupd32q/AC0Vm7TOvAmtbIVqbeYyQiQkgHnuIhST izsw8LuxiNdDXSLIMOUCMA1z1nenEubILC+0ToQnLy+XzyBc2waSr8mWYVZaPIg9hrDlPG Wyrb2jaL++UjSQwtq4QZFQe48lGD57pCqs8nSv8BkeDAhJTLhhJbe/eB/5bbZw== Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 01:30:33 +0200 To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-GND-Sasl: michael@niedermayer.cc Message-ID-Hash: R5HSFDZEKI2YFJKCISYNO3IVVANEUGYT X-Message-ID-Hash: R5HSFDZEKI2YFJKCISYNO3IVVANEUGYT X-MailFrom: SRS0=SZRR=45=niedermayer.cc=michael@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-0; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-1; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-2; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-3; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Preferred Issue Tracker List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Archived-At: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel Cc: Michael Niedermayer Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4699000817808158589==" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============4699000817808158589== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="befj9uXPks8tsLNs" Content-Disposition: inline --befj9uXPks8tsLNs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Timo On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-deve= l wrote: > On 20.10.2025 18:14, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > > Hi everyone > >=20 > > We currently have 2 issue trackers (trac and forgejo), > >=20 > > Previous discussion: > > "[RFC] Issue tracker" and "trac ticket statistics" > > https://lists.ffmpeg.org/archives/list/ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org/thread/H= S46O6K62MHRHJDJC45XLRMR64RE5IB7/#LMXCTJDF5SIUSX43X7YZ4347U5YHWW33 > >=20 > > I think there are 2 questions, the first is, > > which issue tracker do we want to use going forward? > > And the 2nd question is, about migrating tickets. > >=20 > > First lets establish which tracker we want to use going forward. > > It seems there where 2 options suggested. > >=20 > > "T", Trac, with a potential future switch to redmine (similar to trac) > >=20 > > "F", Forgejo >=20 >=20 > F for Forgejo, simply because maintaining two applications, specially one= as > old and "brittle" as trac is a pain. >=20 > trac currently needs subtantially more server resources than Forgejo, whi= le > having roughly similar amounts of requests. > It also frequently goes down if the traffic goes too hard, and needs a > reboot to come back. trac never needed a reboot previously, not that i remember. I do remember when it used sqlite and under load it sometimes showed database locked errors but it always recovered from this with no action fro= m the admin at all. just waiting, and i think these errors stoped after tuning sqlite a= bit what exactly did get stuck ? The current setup is different from what it was >=20 > I also personally feel like we don't really need/use any of the more > advanced features in trac. At least I have never looked at votes before, = or > heard anyone talk about them before Forgejo came up. I was just in the recent days using the upvotes as a means to find the most popular bugs and feature requests for the sponsoring RFC Sponsoring or not, I want to know which bugs and feature requests affect our users most. This does matter. Has nothing to do with sponsoring. Plain and simple, if i have time to work on something, i would want to spend it on something that has impact and "sort by vote count" is the simpl= e awnser. > The only clear advantage it has is the much more refined search, but that= 's > something other people have noticed to be lacking in Forgejo as well, so > there is ongoing effort to improve it. There also was ongoing work on libavcodec to have a generic "MPEG" encoder that would handle h264 and later standards ... very long ago >=20 >=20 > Also, redmine is not something one can just switch to. > It looks similar, but is an entirely seaprate thing. > There is also no clear way to migrate to it, so it'd be another disruptive > switch. > There is https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/redminemigrate > but it explicitly says the migration from Trac is obsolete and does not > work. IIUC the convert script needs a patch and or a older intermediate redmine They removed trac import support as everyone who needed it no longer needs = it you can look at for example https://www.redmine.org/issues/33722 In a comment: "I already migrated from Trac to Gitlab via Redmine by using this patch." So the convert worked in the past. thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB When you are offended at any man's fault, turn to yourself and study your own failings. Then you will forget your anger. -- Epictetus --befj9uXPks8tsLNs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEKAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCaPbGFgAKCRBhHseHBAsP qwD3AJ0WeVCrPAZjy45qK++yemSFCAcSsgCeNbkCArM52v+J3YahjICK6r8jCek= =lCKZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --befj9uXPks8tsLNs-- --===============4699000817808158589== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org --===============4699000817808158589==--