[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org vs. ML

[Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>]

On 2025-09-16 10:49 +0200, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> 
[...]
> 
> * If we keep forgejo we will likely transition our issue tracker tickets
>   into forgejo too, discussing with timo yesterday night indicates that
>   this likely can be done cleaner and neater than at first expected.

I would say this is not an absolute requirement and you also say likely.

Just saw Timo voicing his concerns in #ffmpeg-devel , not on the
technical part but about if it really is a good idea.

I'm not entirely sure what is best and on the practicality and effort.
Could also imagine to leave a static readonly version online and add a
banner at the top on how to proceed with new issues.

Just saying IMHO we should postpone this detailed discussion to a later
point iff our Forgejo instance will be the primary forge.

Also in that case I think migrating our Trac Wiki would be a good idea
and should be done first (before tackling our Trac issues).


Best regards,
  Alexander (beastd)
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org