From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E2354CF32 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 09:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE15C68C98C; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 12:53:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49E7C687A1D for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 12:53:21 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 57C9rKP3023626 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:53:20 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9CE3C2EFE3; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:53:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:53:20 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20250812090205.A5F4D68B0ED@ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org> <20250812113408.GB24045@haasn.xyz> <1bfcff88-d626-475b-a506-9d60feb5177e@gyani.pro> <20250812115108.GB29347@haasn.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250812115108.GB29347@haasn.xyz> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:53:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Pushing without approval avfilter/vf_vignette: use AVFilterContext for logging X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Niklas Haas (HE12025-08-12): > I see that, but note: > 1) the PR *was* approved How do you know that approval was worth anything? > 2) nobody is listed as a maintainer for these filters So as a default, they are maintained by whoever maintains libavfilter as a whole, which means me since Stefano took steps back from development. > Regardless, I still think we should then just establish a clear pipeline > here to prevent this sort of discussion from happening in the future. > > Timo, can something like the VLC merge bot be implemented in ForgeJo? Technical solution will not solve human problems. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".