From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A62D4CC8D for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 17:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B6668CAEE; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 20:45:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B19687A1D for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 20:45:19 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 578HjIms018938 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 19:45:19 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B0AC82EFE3; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 19:45:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 19:45:18 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20250808172101.5AB3168C2A6@ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Fri, 08 Aug 2025 19:45:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] =?utf-8?b?5Zue5aSNOiAg5Zue5aSNOiAgY3ZzbG9nICh3?= =?utf-8?q?as=3A_=5BSCM=5D_branch_master_updated=2E_dff08a3d2a=29_fate/vvc?= =?utf-8?q?=3A_add_vvc-conformance-FIELD=5FA=5F4?= X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Wu Jianhua (HE12025-08-08): > It seems that I replied incorrectly. I thought you commented on > my patch, but it seems to be an automatically sent merge > notification email instead of my patch email. Misunderstanding, them. Less than an hour ago, I reported that commit notifications were broken since about four days, and suddenly we got a new notification, and it was your patch. So I assumed somebody was working at fixing the issue, and I answered to give thanks but report it was still not perfect. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".