From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org>
Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100])
	by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAA7E4CA67
	for <ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com>; Thu,  7 Aug 2025 12:37:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42AC68D011;
	Thu,  7 Aug 2025 15:37:38 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40])
 by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5CA168B96A
 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Thu,  7 Aug 2025 15:37:32 +0300 (EEST)
X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org )
Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80])
 by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 577CbW3j000513
 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 14:37:32 +0200
Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 3AAEC2EFE3; Thu,  7 Aug 2025 14:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 14:37:32 +0200
From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Message-ID: <aJSeDI2zAhr2LfI2@phare.normalesup.org>
References: <20250804143901.82ED768C3C2@ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org>
 <aJDHirFSrzfJXqzx@phare.normalesup.org>
 <9321627b-8594-4483-923b-cfaef4f09c6c@gmail.com>
 <B5D366C2-83E1-4171-A9E8-594BB45B2CAA@remlab.net>
 <aJMOKCpEcFJd9uVw@phare.normalesup.org>
 <04483110-C623-4E8B-81D2-DE801E54B270@remlab.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <04483110-C623-4E8B-81D2-DE801E54B270@remlab.net>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Thu, 07 Aug 2025 14:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Forgejo entry threshold
X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/options/ffmpeg-devel>,
 <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel>,
 <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org
Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org>
Archived-At: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/aJSeDI2zAhr2LfI2@phare.normalesup.org/>
List-Archive: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/>
List-Post: <mailto:ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com>

R=E9mi Denis-Courmont (HE12025-08-07):
> Sure. You can send a list of patch files... And make it even more difficu=
lt to review,

What? An attached file is not more difficult to review than a mail sent
directly by git, and both are more convenient than a web monstrosity?

Guys, have you never spend five minutes learning how to use mail?

-- =

  Nicolas George
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".