From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5946D4CA28 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 10:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21DA68CF3C; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 13:42:58 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FF9968C112 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 13:42:52 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 577AgpEj012200 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 12:42:51 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 757E32EFE3; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 12:42:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 12:42:51 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20250804143901.82ED768C3C2@ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org> <9321627b-8594-4483-923b-cfaef4f09c6c@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Thu, 07 Aug 2025 12:42:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Forgejo entry threshold X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Kacper Michajlow (HE12025-08-05): > Those "idiot wannabe coders," as you call them, are simply not > interested in low-level C/ASM media processing libraries. They use > Playskool Plastic Tool Kit to develop web applications in javascript. Let us make sure they stay there. > Seriously, I think elitism and gatekeeping are not the right approach. I am pretty sure it is the only approach that can save a project that is severely undercrewed of people who know the code well. > Judging someone's contribution quality based on whether they use gmail > or other "non-approved" tools is unfair. It saddens me that this kind > of attitude comes from a senior member of the community with so much > experience in the project. Indeed, that would be unfair. But the only unfair and dishonest thing here is you misrepresenting my words publicly. The quality of your contribution can be seen with `git log -p`. What your use of GMail's software discredits is not the quality of your contribution but the relevance of your advice on using mail. > The whole point is to attract new contributors and make the workflow > easier for everyone Still that idiotic idea that attracting more newbies will solve the issue that we do not have enough senior developers. > to improve productivity. The current bullshit decreases the productivity of the most productive member of the project. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".