Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Cc: Alexander Strasser <eclipse7@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] rebasing security
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 08:51:01 +0200
Message-ID: <aJL7VQq6vndxGAZh@metallschleim.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250805223748.GV29660@pb2>

On 2025-08-06 00:37 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 10:15:53PM +0200, Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
[...]
> > 
> > If I understand the original point you wanted to discuss correctly,
> > than this is not a question of rebase or merge but one of letting
> > **commits happen on the forge**. If it happens it bears the
> > possibility of modification on the server the forge is running on.
> 
> It is a question of rebase vs merge because
> if the forge generates a merge A+B and lets assume it tampers with it
> this is trivially detectable from nothing than just the git checkout
> 
> To detect it:
> just redo every merge that is not signed or that is signed by the forgejo key
> the tree after it, either matches or it was very likely tampered with

That would require to redo each merge commit with exact meta.
If you only compare the tree contents, that wouldn't be necessary but is
a good bit less secure.


> With rebases, detection is possible but more complex
> First you need not just the git checkout but every single pull request
> and exactly the last pushed one before the rebase and they need to have been
> signed.
> Then you can redo all the rebases and verify that they have not been tampered with
> 
> With the merge case the last pull requests are part of the git checkout and
> signing is not critical because when something is part of a git checkout
> its just hard to tamper with it, the author might notice it mismatches

I agree it's easier to check with merges, but it doesn't sound like
something usual people would do. So would mostly only be relevant if
we set up something to double check.


IMHO we should not right now discuss and possibly change
workflow / branching model of FFmpeg. Right now we have enough in limbo,
so changing this too might be a bit too much at a time.

As you already mentioned there are other advantages to merging, so
it might make sense to bring it up again at some point.


  Alexander
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-06  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-03 15:31 Michael Niedermayer
2025-08-03 15:38 ` Timo Rothenpieler
2025-08-03 15:43   ` James Almer
2025-08-03 18:08   ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-08-03 19:02 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-08-03 20:01   ` Timo Rothenpieler
2025-08-03 20:29     ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-08-03 20:34       ` Timo Rothenpieler
2025-08-04 20:15   ` Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel
2025-08-04 21:36     ` Marton Balint
2025-08-05  3:06       ` Kacper Michajlow
2025-08-05  3:18         ` Kacper Michajlow
2025-08-05  4:05         ` Jacob Lifshay
2025-08-05 22:18         ` Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel
2025-08-05 22:37     ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-08-06  6:51       ` Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel [this message]
2025-08-06 11:50         ` Michael Niedermayer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aJL7VQq6vndxGAZh@metallschleim.local \
    --to=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    --cc=eclipse7@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git