From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D664C650 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 10:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0358668B912; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:53:40 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 592B168B912 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:53:33 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 574ArWDb025566 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 12:53:32 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 878D72EFE3; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 12:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 12:53:32 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20250614225713.GP29660@pb2> <20250621215947.GY29660@pb2> <20250728002212.GX29660@pb2> <20250803213630.GI29660@pb2> <20250804001103.GR29660@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] ogg/vorbis: implement header packet skip in chained ogg bitstreams. X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-08-04): > It's really a huge mystery why developers are leaving. > > We may never know the answer. Let me guess. We tell our long-time developers that the new and exciting code they wrote does not belong in the project. We give write access to people who have been there just a few months and have only been moving code around and fixing warnings, and let them think they do not need to listen to advice. We replace an infrastructure for which long-time developers had established shortcuts and productivity tricks with a monster that offers half the features required to do the same in order to attract more drive-by contributors who will never be able to review patches. But I am sure you were thinking of exactly the opposite. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".