From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5324C205 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AE668CA40; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:44:10 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E547D68C59E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:44:03 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 56ULi3sj024779 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 23:44:03 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 371B82EFDD; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 23:44:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 23:44:03 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20250711194929.1293-1-kasper93@gmail.com> <20250728223416.GJ29660@pb2> <2BF41DF8-AA92-4856-BCD4-B5BAE9A7C671@gmx.net> <8D537917-5FFD-4FC1-B699-05C2A596CCFD@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8D537917-5FFD-4FC1-B699-05C2A596CCFD@gmx.net> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Wed, 30 Jul 2025 23:44:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/subfile: clip seek offset X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-07-30): > Also to make FFmpeg more attractive for new > contributors and hopefully maintainers as well. At some point, I hope you will realize how bad an idea it is to try to attract more newbies, dilettantes and vibe coders at the cost of making the people who have the knowledge to review patches less productive. > Receiving and controlling everything via mails > was never an objective AFAIK. And IMHO it should not be. > > There is CLI tooling which might or might not > suit your preferences. Then let us pull the plus on this half-assed experiment and maybe start again in a year or two when these are documented and up to their promises. > There is a lot to still figure out and that > is expected and do-able. Just needs > some more work and co-operation. I clarify but stand by my position: I will review this patch when doing so does not require more work than it used to. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".