From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7B784BDB6 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 15:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA70468D6DA; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 18:09:18 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D2F968C21E for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 18:09:12 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 56OF9BXu022005 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:09:11 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6C0182EFE3; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:09:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:09:11 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <9fe76bed-32d9-432e-be0a-be00a2a513c7@lynne.ee> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:09:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Notifications for the new monolithic tool X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Timo Rothenpieler (HE12025-07-24): > If the "was synchronized" notifications could be disabled, it'd be much more > reasonable I feel. > But that does not seem to be an option, it's all or nothing. I am not sure what you mean here. If a patch is submitted to the monolithic thing, the patch must be mirrored on the mailing-list. If a comment on a patch is submitted to the monolithic thing, the comment must be mirrored on the mailing-list. I personally do not care, but you probably want to have it mirrored the other way around too. And this: # View it on FFmpeg Forgejo ( https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20031 ) or reply to this email directly. is not adequate. > I do see the issue that splitting the existing developer base off though. That would be a catastrophe. > So without this, people might get left behind, so it should be left on until > at least a significant portion of developers have signed up and gotten added > to the Team. > > I have not received a single request to be added yet. You have not documented that it was necessary yet. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".