From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF434C790 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 13:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DDB687DE4; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 16:10:33 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE4A6803F3 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 16:10:27 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 558DAQNr013659 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 15:10:26 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2A8032EFE4; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 15:10:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 15:10:26 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20250604204216.GT29660@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Sun, 08 Jun 2025 15:10:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Subtitle Filtering Ramp-Up X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Devin Heitmueller (HE12025-06-06): > Respectfully, you just spent six paragraphs lamenting how bad > softworks patches are, when you could have proven your point with a > single command line (which would have demonstrated your concerns > definitively). I do not need to prove my knowledge of libavfilter. Patch reviewer asking patch submitter to run some more tests or a benchmark is a completely standard part of the review process; the patch reviewer is not expected to do the work, although they can help if the patch submitter asks nicely. We are in this mess only because softworkz refuses to comply to this perfectly normal request. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".