From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2938A4CE84 for ; Thu, 29 May 2025 14:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3150968DA75; Thu, 29 May 2025 17:43:56 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803C768D526 for ; Thu, 29 May 2025 17:43:54 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 54TEhrUe019255 for ; Thu, 29 May 2025 16:43:53 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5E3802EFE3; Thu, 29 May 2025 16:43:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 16:43:53 +0200 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Thu, 29 May 2025 16:43:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] The "bad" Patch X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: softworkz . (HE12025-05-28): > Also, I cannot = > consider people as trustworthy while they are going crazy. Oh, yes, I dare say insulting your betters is the best strategy. I have no qualms saying =AB=A0your betters=A0=BB since I was barely involve= d in this discussion. > Misunderstanding 1: What is being launched? > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Explaining that there are a lot more code involved in this feature than just a web browser is not the winning argument you think it is, quite the opposite. People have pointed to you the use of system() because it is an focal point of all the wrong things, an easy way to get into the documentation and learn about the issues of what you are doing. > As far as I'm seeing it, an API can hardly be intrinsically bad. This is just an incredibly shortsighted statement. Somebody capable of saying something like that cannot be trusted with the design of an API. > I have no intentions towards getting this merged. Good. Maye get over yourself and find a safe way of implementing it instead of using it as an excuse to play the victim. Also, for pity's sake, stop sucking all the air from this mailing-list. -- = Nicolas George, willing to endorse the necessary bad role here _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".