From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org>
Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100])
	by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E0874BC9B
	for <ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com>; Thu, 22 May 2025 08:50:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325A968CBDD;
	Thu, 22 May 2025 11:50:21 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40])
 by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7CAC68C477
 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Thu, 22 May 2025 11:50:14 +0300 (EEST)
X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org )
Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80])
 by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 54M8oENS029635
 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Thu, 22 May 2025 10:50:14 +0200
Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 1609E2EFE3; Thu, 22 May 2025 10:50:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 10:50:14 +0200
From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Message-ID: <aC7lRtdnyHouzCR8@phare.normalesup.org>
References: <DM8P223MB036557FE6BF9356FA16030F3BA9EA@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <CABGuwEkXQCKSKV9OPxCG0CoCHT2ALNpY+QBY=windK1_ZNtgvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALbjROLnug1X8k2GL0NuHvr3NtCWZ2y2o1yr5zv4VXy6-ZmKKg@mail.gmail.com>
 <DM8P223MB036513C34AB52754E43DD6DFBA9EA@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <DM8P223MB03651237338408D7D65FDDCDBA9EA@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <CABGuwEmyXEwwaffsjmfyrEP23iPgEiK3kmkYONjX1q_rXgumRQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABGuwEmyXEwwaffsjmfyrEP23iPgEiK3kmkYONjX1q_rXgumRQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Thu, 22 May 2025 10:50:14 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/options/ffmpeg-devel>,
 <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel>,
 <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org
Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org>
Archived-At: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/aC7lRtdnyHouzCR8@phare.normalesup.org/>
List-Archive: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/>
List-Post: <mailto:ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com>

Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-05-22):
> It's obvious basic testing was not done on this patchset seeing the scale
> of memory leaks.
> 
> I would like the TC to decide on reverting and proper resubmission later.

For once, I agree with that assessment. I think giving softworkz the
authority to decide if his own patches are ready for inclusion was
premature.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".