From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDF843AAB for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 22:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AB168B8E7; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 01:52:40 +0300 (EEST) Received: from iq.passwd.hu (iq.passwd.hu [217.27.212.140]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B711A68B791 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 01:52:33 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iq.passwd.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5F6E7624 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 00:52:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at passwd.hu Received: from iq.passwd.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (iq.passwd.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LC4rrJm_5_ak for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 00:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from iq (iq [217.27.212.140]) by iq.passwd.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B90FE7615 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 00:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 00:52:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Marton Balint To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20220607113500.GU396728@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.1 X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sun, 19 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 4:59 PM Marton Balint wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:35 AM Michael Niedermayer >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi all >> >> >> >> As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july >> >> That means in the next weeks probably! >> >> If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bugs, >> >> please help fixing them >> >> >> >> Also as was suggested before, this release will get the "LTS" tag >> >> unless people feel thats a bad idea of course >> >> >> > >> > There were a few fixes we have in Fedora on top of 5.0 that would be >> > nice to have in upstream 5.1: >> > >> > * http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-February/292877.html >> > * http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-February/292853.html >> > * http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-February/293194.html >> > >> > Would it be possible to make sure these are in? >> > >> >> These are already merged, except the last patch, which needs some further >> explanaition if this is cosmetic change or actually changes some behaviour >> (other than the possible user facing error message) > > It basically just changes the user facing error message to clients > that interpret the errors to something that makes sense. Ok, applied with that additional info. Thanks, Marton _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".