From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168894304D for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637B568B756; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:34:22 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-ua1-f50.google.com (mail-ua1-f50.google.com [209.85.222.50]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6812768B15E for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:34:16 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-ua1-f50.google.com with SMTP id r15so10453517uao.3 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 03:34:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4iFXfO4/VHVXrW4YnhHskatWm5SaaGlhQsKRvytJ67Q=; b=VADsAhtzgyhPNbrH0ZXNogS8I1ISIPUGCDHddQPiw89iI1pMEwVylmzBfTS0xP7349 /+THLpEhft50QGYGe3nH4kA7E3FrHOfVjd/LGacecWAPjoXOXcxR0+YQ6g7eUMJFx/yM qOUTTjC07Un3UfK0rb42xtUyVF/KyxbgraVD1LfDt4IINNyefPopn18bsTfwRSGZxiaD Y/ZG9fvKLsC/9mYpqcgVcYcZ6jusd2BOxnnb1SwoJolF9abmlWrC5jjvkgDC+XLqL+eW U+st0mOiGOOnoTgfeeSH5ShqCC2KP44KWgdjnLMCX9LSZualRaxYSmCOmgSCGMkMaor9 lUpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4iFXfO4/VHVXrW4YnhHskatWm5SaaGlhQsKRvytJ67Q=; b=GqXJkFWwQGvOFGSBF9TOzzlRWJW6sjm0TtltY3hlt6KpK0nt+Pm1z/mS9gIrflZCFm WOpnvSBelfnxMQRamJDhsYUjqP407EOiK3HIpoV6Nl1p2DW4rp3s+2dAAqkQu62dewTA OS96SpFCj7slDvizGTMoRPHAOYi0YDvzXVYgaBWqGmZOrFVn9j3jtsYMMRTlqwPGt9Tb egtXa7lRHZZ+vWv88l0XJbFbuLAGMglIp1E6mNONYiNn54xHj+w+H3pTzFRHxgWh8k0E 6MoEhRMUQ5ya7X06/bYRUi77KpiihtmltjwmeIg5MrpNajb4asZf0vOLdIpfT/asbU+I /vog== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533OEj6V7bqyZAS1YL8eFTcEmlQKBC9r+EEJHnj+kZuww7N/aYeJ aO428C1wtIA6ZC6kpYaDzps+Y/ZwGzY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0ev3WLDCHCpBMBXekDTduDdD99a5I2Rh2yZVflxLTGnJJMTsnxMN0XiymMsr5kRY+MCw2cQ== X-Received: by 2002:a67:d51b:: with SMTP id l27mr1780271vsj.23.1642073654326; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 03:34:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] ([186.136.131.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x75sm1425329vkc.36.2022.01.13.03.34.13 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Jan 2022 03:34:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:34:12 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Content-Language: en-US To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <20220108163012.GF2829255@pb2> <20220112163051.GJ2829255@pb2> <9ea7cfe56c33584a7e7dff19936be3191f21be00.camel@intel.com> From: James Almer In-Reply-To: <9ea7cfe56c33584a7e7dff19936be3191f21be00.camel@intel.com> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 5.0 blocking issues X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 1/13/2022 1:02 AM, Xiang, Haihao wrote: > On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 21:35 +0000, Soft Works wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Michael >>> Niedermayer >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 5:31 PM >>> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches >>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 5.0 blocking issues >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Lynne wrote: >>>> 8 Jan 2022, 17:30 by michael@niedermayer.cc: >>>> >>>>> Hi all >>>>> >>>>> This is a simple go/no go call >>>>> if you know of something that still should go into 5.0 please reply here >>>>> with a list of what you are working on and a timelimit until when you >>>>> will be done with it >>>>> >>>>> if you think everything is ready for the release, then too feel free to >>>>> reply (assuming few others said ok yet) this is not supposed to become a >>>>> 100 reply thread with oks, just maybe 2-3 people confirming that noone >>>>> is aware of things missing. >>>>> >>>>> I intend to do the release within 2-3 days of all "no go" things being >>>>> resolved or timeouting >>>>> >>>>> thx >>>>> >>>> >>>> Both of elenril and mkver's patches got merged, isn't it >>>> time to tag and make archives already? >>> >>> something is not working efficiently here >>> There have been more replies here than from elenril and mkver >>> also there have been over the ML multiple requests for backports >>> to 5.0 today. (which may or may not be all unimportant) >>> We do need a better way to detect when a branch is ready for release >>> or master is ready to be branched. >>> Iam really bad at keeping track of everything everyone asks to be >>> included and then notice when it was included fully with nothing >>> missing and no amendmends. >>> Maybe we could put a RELEASE_BLOCKER file in release branches in the future >>> and everyone can list in it what needs to be done before the release >>> and when something is done the person pushing would also remove that >>> line from the file. >>> >>> for 5.0 now, i guess this is a 2nd go/no go call here >>> anything else that I should wait for ? >>> if not i will make the release _probably_ in the next 2-3 days or so >>> (if nothing interferes) >> >> >> [PATCH v4] avfilter/vpp_qsv: fix regression on older api versions (e.g. 1.11) >> >> Published-As: >> https://github.com/ffstaging/FFmpeg/releases/tag/pr-ffstaging-15%2Fsoftworkz%2Fqsv_vpp_regression-v4 >> >> Pull-Request: https://github.com/ffstaging/FFmpeg/pull/15 >> Patchwork: >> https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/pull.15.v4.ffstaging.FFmpeg.1641538891098.ffmpegagent@gmail.com/ >> >> => Has been merged in to master >> > > It would be better to include this fix in 5.0 release. May I cherry-pick this > patch to the release branch ? It's a bug fix, not a feature addition or behavior change, so it matches the criteria for backporting. Feel free to do it. > > Thanks > Haihao > > >> >> [PATCH] avcodec/dvdsubdec: fix incorrect yellow appearance of dvd subtitles >> >> Published-As: >> https://github.com/ffstaging/FFmpeg/releases/tag/pr-ffstaging-16%2Fsoftworkz%2Fpatch_dvdsubdec_fix-v1 >> >> Pull-Request: https://github.com/ffstaging/FFmpeg/pull/16 >> Patchwork: >> https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/pull.16.ffstaging.FFmpeg.1641262759164.ffmpegagent@gmail.com/ >> >> => not merged yet >> >> >> Thanks, >> softworkz >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".