Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/cuviddec: update parser ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces
@ 2023-08-11 17:50 Random Joe
  2023-08-11 21:15 ` Timo Rothenpieler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Random Joe @ 2023-08-11 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ffmpeg-devel

Fixes video output stutter caused by different number of buffers in
decoder vs parser introduced in 402d98c.

Signed-off-by: Random Joe <ff.random.joe@gmail.com>
---
  libavcodec/cuviddec.c | 13 +++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libavcodec/cuviddec.c b/libavcodec/cuviddec.c
index 814bc53f70..1b62832eca 100644
--- a/libavcodec/cuviddec.c
+++ b/libavcodec/cuviddec.c
@@ -360,7 +360,14 @@ static int CUDAAPI cuvid_handle_video_sequence(void *opaque, CUVIDEOFORMAT* form
          }
      }
  
-    return 1;
+    // make CUVIDDECODECREATEINFO::ulNumDecodeSurfaces = CUVIDPARSERPARAMS::ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces
+    // returning a value > 1  , will notify the driver to set the parser ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces
+    // to this return value .
+
+    if(ctx->cuparseinfo.ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces != cuinfo.ulNumDecodeSurfaces)
+        return cuinfo.ulNumDecodeSurfaces;
+    else
+        return 1;
  }
  
  static int CUDAAPI cuvid_handle_picture_decode(void *opaque, CUVIDPICPARAMS* picparams)
@@ -1022,7 +1029,9 @@ static av_cold int cuvid_decode_init(AVCodecContext *avctx)
          goto error;
      }
  
-    ctx->cuparseinfo.ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces = ctx->nb_surfaces;
+    // set ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces to a dummy value of 1 as recommended in NVDEC Programming Guide
+    // set the optimal value in pfnSequenceCallback where CUVIDEOFORMAT::min_num_decode_surfaces is reported
+    ctx->cuparseinfo.ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces = 1;
      ctx->cuparseinfo.ulMaxDisplayDelay = (avctx->flags & AV_CODEC_FLAG_LOW_DELAY) ? 0 : CUVID_MAX_DISPLAY_DELAY;
      ctx->cuparseinfo.pUserData = avctx;
      ctx->cuparseinfo.pfnSequenceCallback = cuvid_handle_video_sequence;
-- 
2.39.2

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/cuviddec: update parser ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces
  2023-08-11 17:50 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/cuviddec: update parser ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces Random Joe
@ 2023-08-11 21:15 ` Timo Rothenpieler
  2023-08-11 23:54   ` Random Joe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Timo Rothenpieler @ 2023-08-11 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ffmpeg-devel

On 11.08.2023 19:50, Random Joe wrote:
> Fixes video output stutter caused by different number of buffers in
> decoder vs parser introduced in 402d98c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Random Joe <ff.random.joe@gmail.com>
> ---
>   libavcodec/cuviddec.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libavcodec/cuviddec.c b/libavcodec/cuviddec.c
> index 814bc53f70..1b62832eca 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/cuviddec.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/cuviddec.c
> @@ -360,7 +360,14 @@ static int CUDAAPI cuvid_handle_video_sequence(void 
> *opaque, CUVIDEOFORMAT* form
>           }
>       }
> 
> -    return 1;
> +    // make CUVIDDECODECREATEINFO::ulNumDecodeSurfaces = 
> CUVIDPARSERPARAMS::ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces
> +    // returning a value > 1  , will notify the driver to set the 
> parser ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces
> +    // to this return value .
> +
> +    if(ctx->cuparseinfo.ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces != 
> cuinfo.ulNumDecodeSurfaces)
> +        return cuinfo.ulNumDecodeSurfaces;
> +    else
> +        return 1;

Any reason to not just always return nb_surfaces here?
I don't really understand why this would cause stuttering though. It 
might waste a bit of memory to always set the maximum number to the 
allowed maximum, but why would it hurt performance?

>   }
> 
>   static int CUDAAPI cuvid_handle_picture_decode(void *opaque, 
> CUVIDPICPARAMS* picparams)
> @@ -1022,7 +1029,9 @@ static av_cold int 
> cuvid_decode_init(AVCodecContext *avctx)
>           goto error;
>       }
> 
> -    ctx->cuparseinfo.ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces = ctx->nb_surfaces;
> +    // set ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces to a dummy value of 1 as recommended 
> in NVDEC Programming Guide
> +    // set the optimal value in pfnSequenceCallback where 
> CUVIDEOFORMAT::min_num_decode_surfaces is reported
> +    ctx->cuparseinfo.ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces = 1;
>       ctx->cuparseinfo.ulMaxDisplayDelay = (avctx->flags & 
> AV_CODEC_FLAG_LOW_DELAY) ? 0 : CUVID_MAX_DISPLAY_DELAY;
>       ctx->cuparseinfo.pUserData = avctx;
>       ctx->cuparseinfo.pfnSequenceCallback = cuvid_handle_video_sequence;
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/cuviddec: update parser ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces
  2023-08-11 21:15 ` Timo Rothenpieler
@ 2023-08-11 23:54   ` Random Joe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Random Joe @ 2023-08-11 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches

Only update ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces if necessary.
As for the stutter , I can't tell for sure , maybe it's a race
condition somewhere in the driver.
402d98c decoupled cuvid parser and decoder number of decode buffers ,
with parser buffers
set to be always CUVID_DEFAULT_NUM_SURFACES (5).
In NVDEC Programming Guide they recommend setting an equal number of
buffers for parser and decoder.
Here are my test outputs and logs , edited memory pointers for better
files comparison :
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1f0ehcNxQV-0sMvm2g66J97kHxAGeRKUT


On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 12:15 AM Timo Rothenpieler
<timo@rothenpieler.org> wrote:
>
> On 11.08.2023 19:50, Random Joe wrote:
> Any reason to not just always return nb_surfaces here?
> I don't really understand why this would cause stuttering though. It
> might waste a bit of memory to always set the maximum number to the
> allowed maximum, but why would it hurt performance?
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-11 23:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-11 17:50 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/cuviddec: update parser ulMaxNumDecodeSurfaces Random Joe
2023-08-11 21:15 ` Timo Rothenpieler
2023-08-11 23:54   ` Random Joe

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git