From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3604B462 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9D868DBD2; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 21:03:30 +0300 (EEST) Received: from b-painless.mh.aa.net.uk (b-painless.mh.aa.net.uk [81.187.30.52]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C71F668DB00 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 21:03:23 +0300 (EEST) Received: from 3.4.3.5.7.1.0.f.c.9.9.9.9.3.2.a.0.5.8.0.9.1.8.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa ([2001:8b0:819:850:a239:999c:f017:5343] helo=andrews-2024-laptop.sayers) by painless-b.tch.aa.net.uk with smtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sQ9km-002IH1-1A for ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 19:03:22 +0100 Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 19:03:21 +0100 From: Andrew Sayers To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20240702090917.319956-1-ffmpeg-devel@pileofstuff.org> <20240706164951.GH4991@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240706164951.GH4991@pb2> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] s/RUNTIME/POST_INIT_SETTABLE/ X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 06:49:51PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:40:07PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > [...] > > > its much more text to type too. > > shorter options: > > AV_OPT_FLAG_ALTERABLE_PARAM > > AV_OPT_FLAG_MUTABLE_PARAM > > (just in case consensus ends on a rename, i am not sure a rename is a good idea here) I'm fine with someone doing s/POST_INIT_SETTABLE/MUTABLE/g on the patch before committing it if they feel that's better, but ALTERABLE seems like a bad idea. I guess you could argue a sufficiently inattentive reader might read "POST_INIT_SETTABLE" to mean "*only* settable after init", even though the documentation says otherwise. But such a reader might also read "ALTERABLE" to somehow mean "data type can be altered" (like SQL's ALTER TABLE statement), whereas "mutable" conventionally means "contents can be altered". But this is just a nitpick - POST_INIT_SETTABLE is still fine by me. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".