From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9D848F69 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 09:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B4468D512; Fri, 31 May 2024 12:07:32 +0300 (EEST) Received: from alt2.a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk (alt2.a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk [81.187.30.51]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2B0F68D01E for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 12:07:25 +0300 (EEST) Received: from a.0.a.5.b.9.e.4.c.8.2.0.e.c.1.7.0.5.8.0.9.1.8.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa ([2001:8b0:819:850:71ce:28c:4e9b:5a0a] helo=andrews-2024-laptop.sayers) by painless-a.thn.aa.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sCyEO-00Ghj8-2v for ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:07:25 +0100 Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 10:07:15 +0100 From: Andrew Sayers To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <91C9E49E-1EE3-4B37-AEF7-1A0D78481633@remlab.net> <20240516115959.3786610-1-ffmpeg-devel@pileofstuff.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240516115959.3786610-1-ffmpeg-devel@pileofstuff.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] avformat/network: improve ff_neterrno() X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:59:05PM +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:42:23PM +0300, R=E9mi Denis-Courmont wrote: > > Err, please. Keep this to the Windows back-end. Nothing good is going t= o happen with a function that does nothing (on other platforms) and has a n= ondescript numbered name. > = > I have no strong opinion either way, and it feels rather bikesheddable. > Here's a version with the offending part moved to its own patch - > I'm happy for whoever applies this to decide whether they want to > keep or chuck patch 4/6 :) Ping? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".