From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419EE49D39 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5645C68CF92; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:50:04 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDAB68C25D for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:49:57 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 428GnvPD014830 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:49:57 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 12B8029536; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:49:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:49:56 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Fri, 08 Mar 2024 17:49:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavc: replace ff_thread_get_buffer() with ff_get_buffer() X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Kieran Kunhya (12024-03-08): > New contributors are not interested in your biased history lessons. They > want to write code and have a modern, well run project, not a dysfunctional > mess. And we go back to the core question: does the strength of this project come from paid-for contributors maintaining each small parts of the project, or does it come from hackers who play with many parts of the code and have original ideas to try? I think the answer is obvious. Unfortunately, the first category is the majority in number. Which is why we should go back on democracy, it was a trap, and re-instate a project leader from the second category. Or just consider that the ousting of the leader was unlawful. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".