From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D1249D2E for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 15:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A771268CFDD; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:46:21 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F40D68CF41 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:46:15 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 428FkEDg028574 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:46:14 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9DC1229536; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:46:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:46:14 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <170989331707.7287.60934458751012067@lain.khirnov.net> <170989589460.662.6679884374613626910@lain.khirnov.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:46:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavc: replace ff_thread_get_buffer() with ff_get_buffer() X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Sean McGovern (12024-03-08): > It is really mean-spirited to make such comments about a project that is no > longer in operation. Can't we look forward instead of behind us? The project libav might be dead, but the people who made it are not, not even retired, just look who signed its manifest. Quite the opposite, you can see they have in the recent years gained a lot of influence in FFmpeg, and are now in the process of having FFmpeg apply the same kind of rules and procedure and evolution ad libav. Which is not a good idea considering the killed libav with these rules and procedures and evolution. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".