From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0A0497CA for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F25A68D376; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:41:12 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 936D068D1CF for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:41:06 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 41JEf5IZ005413 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:41:06 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C9E0929536; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:41:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:41:05 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <170819974399.21676.13449065399578350362@lain.khirnov.net> <20240218004314.GM6420@pb2> <170828044320.21676.10142270056126999587@lain.khirnov.net> <20240218223439.GP6420@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:41:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Vittorio Giovara (12024-02-19): > > By that reasoning, it could be argued that someone proposed the inclusion of > > this rule being discussed only to set up a backdoor in the process and > > thwart any chance of a functioning process for the community > As mentioned, it's just a hyperbole, extending the deviance of this thought > logic. Indeed, somebody stupid enough to not how a rule to prevent somebody from placing themselves above the others is necessary could make that argument. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".