From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AA1495CD for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0FD68D17B; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:14:09 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DADE68CCAE for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:14:02 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 41DJE1tq026977 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 20:14:01 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6E9812EFE9; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 20:14:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 20:14:01 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <45697A7F-DB26-49AD-825D-AFE305822205@remlab.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45697A7F-DB26-49AD-825D-AFE305822205@remlab.net> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Tue, 13 Feb 2024 20:14:01 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [TC] Decision on FF_INTERNAL_FIELDS in libavfilter X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: R=E9mi Denis-Courmont (12024-02-13): > Speaking as an elected member of another OSS project's TC, I believe > that the experienced adult developers on the FFmpeg TC are perfectly > capable of reading mailing archives and Trac comments as necessary. In > fact, I think it is preferable that they stick to arguments made in > public, rather than go out of their way to dig up private information. So you are thinking that Anton did not summarize and polish his arguments while submitting the question to the TC. Sure, let us believe that. > Or to follow your metaphor, in a trial, the arguments are made before > the jury in public sessions. The deliberations of the jury are kept > private to shield members from external pressure. As a matter of principle, the defense has the last word. > I don't expect that antagonising the TC members will do you, and any > potential future arguments of yours, much good. I have lost all confidence in both committees and consider the only hope to save this project is if Fabrice reboots it. -- = Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".