From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718C848F33 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DE668D306; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:12:19 +0200 (EET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB9C068D294 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:12:13 +0200 (EET) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 40UACDSd010688 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:12:13 +0100 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2630C29539; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:12:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:12:13 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: References: <20240128032549.GN6420@pb2> <0101018d5751ddb7-4f59ae4b-9d90-4b9f-b9fb-64942e75f990-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:12:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Sovereign Tech Fund X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Kieran Kunhya (12024-01-29): > A commercial SOW with a private company that took the commercial risk on > that contract taking longer or being more difficult than anticipated or > someone else doing the work without telling them. > > The terms of that contract were discussed in private and don't affect the > project itself. It does not affect the project itself except in resulting in a patch series that was developer all alone, wasting the benefit of having several competent people contributing ideas for the core design, and an attitude of urgency and closed-mindedness for anything that would delay applying the series once it was posted, even if it was severe breakage of features. But sure, let us pretend that corporate meddling with FFmpeg is not harmful to the project. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".