From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65BAC4C0D1 for <ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 09:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A5F687D37; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 12:14:25 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6FD687CA3 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 12:14:18 +0300 (EEST) X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org ) Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef.ens.fr (8.14.4/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id 5379EHwH003259 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:14:17 +0200 Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 43C772EFD9; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:14:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:14:17 +0200 From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Message-ID: <Z_OXaaYDLDGDLkvo@phare.normalesup.org> References: <DM8P223MB0365066DF0B56E60A0E2C4E9BAAF2@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <c45a5869-e39e-bc20-0559-079f0b93ca37@passwd.hu> <DM8P223MB03657732DC376984DF4ED8DBBAAF2@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <558752ee-492d-0f3a-6201-329741334f30@passwd.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <558752ee-492d-0f3a-6201-329741334f30@passwd.hu> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Mon, 07 Apr 2025 11:14:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Overview X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/options/ffmpeg-devel>, <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel> List-Post: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> List-Help: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel>, <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> Archived-At: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/Z_OXaaYDLDGDLkvo@phare.normalesup.org/> List-Archive: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/> List-Post: <mailto:ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com> Marton Balint (HE12025-04-06): > I think a log flag to completely hide the addresses makes sense, and can be > implemented cleanly and reliably in avutil/log. I can totally support that. I do not. The more I think on it, the more I consider this whole endeavour is completely misguided. One of our guiding principles is that the console output of our command-line tools should be, by default, usable by experienced users. This is why we reject proposals to hide the banner by default, and this is why we should not do this either. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".